psychology dissertation method section

Generate accurate APA citations for free

• Knowledge Base
• APA Style 7th edition
• How to write an APA methods section

How to Write an APA Methods Section | With Examples

Published on February 5, 2021 by Pritha Bhandari . Revised on June 22, 2023.

The methods section of an APA style paper is where you report in detail how you performed your study. Research papers in the social and natural sciences often follow APA style. This article focuses on reporting quantitative research methods .

In your APA methods section, you should report enough information to understand and replicate your study, including detailed information on the sample , measures, and procedures used.

Instantly correct all language mistakes in your text

Upload your document to correct all your mistakes in minutes

Table of contents

Structuring an apa methods section.

Participants

Example of an APA methods section

Other interesting articles, frequently asked questions about writing an apa methods section.

The main heading of “Methods” should be centered, boldfaced, and capitalized. Subheadings within this section are left-aligned, boldfaced, and in title case. You can also add lower level headings within these subsections, as long as they follow APA heading styles .

To structure your methods section, you can use the subheadings of “Participants,” “Materials,” and “Procedures.” These headings are not mandatory—aim to organize your methods section using subheadings that make sense for your specific study.

Note that not all of these topics will necessarily be relevant for your study. For example, if you didn’t need to consider outlier removal or ways of assigning participants to different conditions, you don’t have to report these steps.

The APA also provides specific reporting guidelines for different types of research design. These tell you exactly what you need to report for longitudinal designs , replication studies, experimental designs , and so on. If your study uses a combination design, consult APA guidelines for mixed methods studies.

Detailed descriptions of procedures that don’t fit into your main text can be placed in supplemental materials (for example, the exact instructions and tasks given to participants, the full analytical strategy including software code, or additional figures and tables).

Are your APA in-text citations flawless?

The AI-powered APA Citation Checker points out every error, tells you exactly what’s wrong, and explains how to fix it. Say goodbye to losing marks on your assignment!

Get started!

Begin the methods section by reporting sample characteristics, sampling procedures, and the sample size.

Participant or subject characteristics

When discussing people who participate in research, descriptive terms like “participants,” “subjects” and “respondents” can be used. For non-human animal research, “subjects” is more appropriate.

Specify all relevant demographic characteristics of your participants. This may include their age, sex, ethnic or racial group, gender identity, education level, and socioeconomic status. Depending on your study topic, other characteristics like educational or immigration status or language preference may also be relevant.

Be sure to report these characteristics as precisely as possible. This helps the reader understand how far your results may be generalized to other people.

The APA guidelines emphasize writing about participants using bias-free language , so it’s necessary to use inclusive and appropriate terms.

Sampling procedures

Outline how the participants were selected and all inclusion and exclusion criteria applied. Appropriately identify the sampling procedure used. For example, you should only label a sample as random  if you had access to every member of the relevant population.

Of all the people invited to participate in your study, note the percentage that actually did (if you have this data). Additionally, report whether participants were self-selected, either by themselves or by their institutions (e.g., schools may submit student data for research purposes).

Identify any compensation (e.g., course credits or money) that was provided to participants, and mention any institutional review board approvals and ethical standards followed.

Sample size and power

Detail the sample size (per condition) and statistical power that you hoped to achieve, as well as any analyses you performed to determine these numbers.

It’s important to show that your study had enough statistical power to find effects if there were any to be found.

Additionally, state whether your final sample differed from the intended sample. Your interpretations of the study outcomes should be based only on your final sample rather than your intended sample.

Write up the tools and techniques that you used to measure relevant variables. Be as thorough as possible for a complete picture of your techniques.

Primary and secondary measures

Define the primary and secondary outcome measures that will help you answer your primary and secondary research questions.

Specify all instruments used in gathering these measurements and the construct that they measure. These instruments may include hardware, software, or tests, scales, and inventories.

• To cite hardware, indicate the model number and manufacturer.
• To cite common software (e.g., Qualtrics), state the full name along with the version number or the website URL .
• To cite tests, scales or inventories, reference its manual or the article it was published in. It’s also helpful to state the number of items and provide one or two example items.

Make sure to report the settings of (e.g., screen resolution) any specialized apparatus used.

For each instrument used, report measures of the following:

• Reliability : how consistently the method measures something, in terms of internal consistency or test-retest reliability.
• Validity : how precisely the method measures something, in terms of construct validity  or criterion validity .

Giving an example item or two for tests, questionnaires , and interviews is also helpful.

Describe any covariates—these are any additional variables that may explain or predict the outcomes.

Quality of measurements

Review all methods you used to assure the quality of your measurements.

These may include:

• training researchers to collect data reliably,
• using multiple people to assess (e.g., observe or code) the data,
• translation and back-translation of research materials,
• using pilot studies to test your materials on unrelated samples.

For data that’s subjectively coded (for example, classifying open-ended responses), report interrater reliability scores. This tells the reader how similarly each response was rated by multiple raters.

Report all of the procedures applied for administering the study, processing the data, and for planned data analyses.

Data collection methods and research design

Data collection methods refers to the general mode of the instruments: surveys, interviews, observations, focus groups, neuroimaging, cognitive tests, and so on. Summarize exactly how you collected the necessary data.

Describe all procedures you applied in administering surveys, tests, physical recordings, or imaging devices, with enough detail so that someone else can replicate your techniques. If your procedures are very complicated and require long descriptions (e.g., in neuroimaging studies), place these details in supplementary materials.

To report research design, note your overall framework for data collection and analysis. State whether you used an experimental, quasi-experimental, descriptive (observational), correlational, and/or longitudinal design. Also note whether a between-subjects or a within-subjects design was used.

For multi-group studies, report the following design and procedural details as well:

• how participants were assigned to different conditions (e.g., randomization),
• instructions given to the participants in each group,
• interventions for each group,
• the setting and length of each session(s).

Describe whether any masking was used to hide the condition assignment (e.g., placebo or medication condition) from participants or research administrators. Using masking in a multi-group study ensures internal validity by reducing research bias . Explain how this masking was applied and whether its effectiveness was assessed.

Participants were randomly assigned to a control or experimental condition. The survey was administered using Qualtrics (https://www.qualtrics.com). To begin, all participants were given the AAI and a demographics questionnaire to complete, followed by an unrelated filler task. In the control condition , participants completed a short general knowledge test immediately after the filler task. In the experimental condition, participants were asked to visualize themselves taking the test for 3 minutes before they actually did. For more details on the exact instructions and tasks given, see supplementary materials.

Data diagnostics

Outline all steps taken to scrutinize or process the data after collection.

This includes the following:

• Procedures for identifying and removing outliers
• Data transformations to normalize distributions
• Compensation strategies for overcoming missing values

To ensure high validity, you should provide enough detail for your reader to understand how and why you processed or transformed your raw data in these specific ways.

Analytic strategies

The methods section is also where you describe your statistical analysis procedures, but not their outcomes. Their outcomes are reported in the results section.

These procedures should be stated for all primary, secondary, and exploratory hypotheses. While primary and secondary hypotheses are based on a theoretical framework or past studies, exploratory hypotheses are guided by the data you’ve just collected.

Scribbr Citation Checker New

The AI-powered Citation Checker helps you avoid common mistakes such as:

• Missing commas and periods
• Incorrect usage of “et al.”
• Ampersands (&) in narrative citations
• Missing reference entries

This annotated example reports methods for a descriptive correlational survey on the relationship between religiosity and trust in science in the US. Hover over each part for explanation of what is included.

The sample included 879 adults aged between 18 and 28. More than half of the participants were women (56%), and all participants had completed at least 12 years of education. Ethics approval was obtained from the university board before recruitment began. Participants were recruited online through Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk; www.mturk.com). We selected for a geographically diverse sample within the Midwest of the US through an initial screening survey. Participants were paid USD $5 upon completion of the study.

A sample size of at least 783 was deemed necessary for detecting a correlation coefficient of ±.1, with a power level of 80% and a significance level of .05, using a sample size calculator (www.sample-size.net/correlation-sample-size/).

The primary outcome measures were the levels of religiosity and trust in science. Religiosity refers to involvement and belief in religious traditions, while trust in science represents confidence in scientists and scientific research outcomes. The secondary outcome measures were gender and parental education levels of participants and whether these characteristics predicted religiosity levels.

Religiosity

Religiosity was measured using the Centrality of Religiosity scale (Huber, 2003). The Likert scale is made up of 15 questions with five subscales of ideology, experience, intellect, public practice, and private practice. An example item is “How often do you experience situations in which you have the feeling that God or something divine intervenes in your life?” Participants were asked to indicate frequency of occurrence by selecting a response ranging from 1 (very often) to 5 (never). The internal consistency of the instrument is .83 (Huber & Huber, 2012).

Trust in Science

Trust in science was assessed using the General Trust in Science index (McCright, Dentzman, Charters & Dietz, 2013). Four Likert scale items were assessed on a scale from 1 (completely distrust) to 5 (completely trust). An example question asks “How much do you distrust or trust scientists to create knowledge that is unbiased and accurate?” Internal consistency was .8.

Potential participants were invited to participate in the survey online using Qualtrics (www.qualtrics.com). The survey consisted of multiple choice questions regarding demographic characteristics, the Centrality of Religiosity scale, an unrelated filler anagram task, and finally the General Trust in Science index. The filler task was included to avoid priming or demand characteristics, and an attention check was embedded within the religiosity scale. For full instructions and details of tasks, see supplementary materials.

For this correlational study , we assessed our primary hypothesis of a relationship between religiosity and trust in science using Pearson moment correlation coefficient. The statistical significance of the correlation coefficient was assessed using a t test. To test our secondary hypothesis of parental education levels and gender as predictors of religiosity, multiple linear regression analysis was used.

If you want to know more about statistics , methodology , or research bias , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.

• Normal distribution
• Measures of central tendency
• Chi square tests
• Confidence interval
• Quartiles & Quantiles

Methodology

• Cluster sampling
• Stratified sampling
• Thematic analysis
• Cohort study
• Peer review
• Ethnography

Research bias

• Implicit bias
• Cognitive bias
• Conformity bias
• Hawthorne effect
• Availability heuristic
• Attrition bias
• Social desirability bias

In your APA methods section , you should report detailed information on the participants, materials, and procedures used.

• Describe all relevant participant or subject characteristics, the sampling procedures used and the sample size and power .
• Define all primary and secondary measures and discuss the quality of measurements.
• Specify the data collection methods, the research design and data analysis strategy, including any steps taken to transform the data and statistical analyses.

You should report methods using the past tense , even if you haven’t completed your study at the time of writing. That’s because the methods section is intended to describe completed actions or research.

In a scientific paper, the methodology always comes after the introduction and before the results , discussion and conclusion . The same basic structure also applies to a thesis, dissertation , or research proposal .

Depending on the length and type of document, you might also include a literature review or theoretical framework before the methodology.

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.

Bhandari, P. (2023, June 22). How to Write an APA Methods Section | With Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved September 24, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/apa-style/methods-section/

Is this article helpful?

Pritha Bhandari

Other students also liked, how to write an apa results section, apa format for academic papers and essays, apa headings and subheadings, get unlimited documents corrected.

✔ Free APA citation check included ✔ Unlimited document corrections ✔ Specialized in correcting academic texts

• Bipolar Disorder
• Therapy Center
• When To See a Therapist
• Types of Therapy
• Best Online Therapy
• Best Couples Therapy
• Managing Stress
• Sleep and Dreaming
• Understanding Emotions
• Self-Improvement
• Healthy Relationships
• Student Resources
• Personality Types
• Guided Meditations
• Verywell Mind Insights
• 2024 Verywell Mind 25
• Mental Health in the Classroom
• Editorial Process
• Meet Our Review Board
• Crisis Support

How to Write a Methods Section for a Psychology Paper

Tips and Examples of an APA Methods Section

Verywell / Brianna Gilmartin 

The methods section of an APA format psychology paper provides the methods and procedures used in a research study or experiment . This part of an APA paper is critical because it allows other researchers to see exactly how you conducted your research.

Method refers to the procedure that was used in a research study. It included a precise description of how the experiments were performed and why particular procedures were selected. While the APA technically refers to this section as the 'method section,' it is also often known as a 'methods section.'

The methods section ensures the experiment's reproducibility and the assessment of alternative methods that might produce different results. It also allows researchers to replicate the experiment and judge the study's validity.

This article discusses how to write a methods section for a psychology paper, including important elements to include and tips that can help.

What to Include in a Method Section

So what exactly do you need to include when writing your method section? You should provide detailed information on the following:

• Research design
• Participants
• Participant behavior

The method section should provide enough information to allow other researchers to replicate your experiment or study.

Components of a Method Section

The method section should utilize subheadings to divide up different subsections. These subsections typically include participants, materials, design, and procedure.

Participants 

In this part of the method section, you should describe the participants in your experiment, including who they were (and any unique features that set them apart from the general population), how many there were, and how they were selected. If you utilized random selection to choose your participants, it should be noted here.

For example: "We randomly selected 100 children from elementary schools near the University of Arizona."

At the very minimum, this part of your method section must convey:

• Basic demographic characteristics of your participants (such as sex, age, ethnicity, or religion)
• The population from which your participants were drawn
• Any restrictions on your pool of participants
• How many participants were assigned to each condition and how they were assigned to each group (i.e., randomly assignment , another selection method, etc.)
• Why participants took part in your research (i.e., the study was advertised at a college or hospital, they received some type of incentive, etc.)

Information about participants helps other researchers understand how your study was performed, how generalizable the result might be, and allows other researchers to replicate the experiment with other populations to see if they might obtain the same results.

In this part of the method section, you should describe the materials, measures, equipment, or stimuli used in the experiment. This may include:

• Testing instruments
• Technical equipment
• Any psychological assessments that were used
• Any special equipment that was used

For example: "Two stories from Sullivan et al.'s (1994) second-order false belief attribution tasks were used to assess children's understanding of second-order beliefs."

For standard equipment such as computers, televisions, and videos, you can simply name the device and not provide further explanation.

Specialized equipment should be given greater detail, especially if it is complex or created for a niche purpose. In some instances, such as if you created a special material or apparatus for your study, you might need to include an illustration of the item in the appendix of your paper.

In this part of your method section, describe the type of design used in the experiment. Specify the variables as well as the levels of these variables. Identify:

• The independent variables
• Dependent variables
• Control variables
• Any extraneous variables that might influence your results.

Also, explain whether your experiment uses a  within-groups  or between-groups design.

For example: "The experiment used a 3x2 between-subjects design. The independent variables were age and understanding of second-order beliefs."

The next part of your method section should detail the procedures used in your experiment. Your procedures should explain:

• What the participants did
• How data was collected
• The order in which steps occurred

For example: "An examiner interviewed children individually at their school in one session that lasted 20 minutes on average. The examiner explained to each child that he or she would be told two short stories and that some questions would be asked after each story. All sessions were videotaped so the data could later be coded."

Keep this subsection concise yet detailed. Explain what you did and how you did it, but do not overwhelm your readers with too much information.

Tips for How to Write a Methods Section

In addition to following the basic structure of an APA method section, there are also certain things you should remember when writing this section of your paper. Consider the following tips when writing this section:

• Use the past tense : Always write the method section in the past tense.
• Be descriptive : Provide enough detail that another researcher could replicate your experiment, but focus on brevity. Avoid unnecessary detail that is not relevant to the outcome of the experiment.
• Use an academic tone : Use formal language and avoid slang or colloquial expressions. Word choice is also important. Refer to the people in your experiment or study as "participants" rather than "subjects."
• Use APA format : Keep a style guide on hand as you write your method section. The Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association is the official source for APA style.
• Make connections : Read through each section of your paper for agreement with other sections. If you mention procedures in the method section, these elements should be discussed in the results and discussion sections.
• Proofread : Check your paper for grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.. typos, grammar problems, and spelling errors. Although a spell checker is a handy tool, there are some errors only you can catch.

After writing a draft of your method section, be sure to get a second opinion. You can often become too close to your work to see errors or lack of clarity. Take a rough draft of your method section to your university's writing lab for additional assistance.

A Word From Verywell

The method section is one of the most important components of your APA format paper. The goal of your paper should be to clearly detail what you did in your experiment. Provide enough detail that another researcher could replicate your study if they wanted.

Finally, if you are writing your paper for a class or for a specific publication, be sure to keep in mind any specific instructions provided by your instructor or by the journal editor. Your instructor may have certain requirements that you need to follow while writing your method section.

Frequently Asked Questions

While the subsections can vary, the three components that should be included are sections on the participants, the materials, and the procedures.

• Describe who the participants were in the study and how they were selected.
• Define and describe the materials that were used including any equipment, tests, or assessments
• Describe how the data was collected

To write your methods section in APA format, describe your participants, materials, study design, and procedures. Keep this section succinct, and always write in the past tense. The main heading of this section should be labeled "Method" and it should be centered, bolded, and capitalized. Each subheading within this section should be bolded, left-aligned and in title case.

The purpose of the methods section is to describe what you did in your experiment. It should be brief, but include enough detail that someone could replicate your experiment based on this information. Your methods section should detail what you did to answer your research question. Describe how the study was conducted, the study design that was used and why it was chosen, and how you collected the data and analyzed the results.

Erdemir F. How to write a materials and methods section of a scientific article ? Turk J Urol . 2013;39(Suppl 1):10-5. doi:10.5152/tud.2013.047

Kallet RH. How to write the methods section of a research paper . Respir Care . 2004;49(10):1229-32. PMID: 15447808.

American Psychological Association.  Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association  (7th ed.). Washington DC: The American Psychological Association; 2019.

American Psychological Association. APA Style Journal Article Reporting Standards . Published 2020.

By Kendra Cherry, MSEd Kendra Cherry, MS, is a psychosocial rehabilitation specialist, psychology educator, and author of the "Everything Psychology Book."

• Privacy Policy

Home » Dissertation Methodology – Structure, Example and Writing Guide

Dissertation Methodology – Structure, Example and Writing Guide

• Table of Contents

Dissertation Methodology

In any research, the methodology chapter is one of the key components of your dissertation. It provides a detailed description of the methods you used to conduct your research and helps readers understand how you obtained your data and how you plan to analyze it. This section is crucial for replicating the study and validating its results.

Here are the basic elements that are typically included in a dissertation methodology:

• Introduction : This section should explain the importance and goals of your research .
• Research Design : Outline your research approach and why it’s appropriate for your study. You might be conducting an experimental research, a qualitative research, a quantitative research, or a mixed-methods research.
• Data Collection : This section should detail the methods you used to collect your data. Did you use surveys, interviews, observations, etc.? Why did you choose these methods? You should also include who your participants were, how you recruited them, and any ethical considerations.
• Data Analysis : Explain how you intend to analyze the data you collected. This could include statistical analysis, thematic analysis, content analysis, etc., depending on the nature of your study.
• Reliability and Validity : Discuss how you’ve ensured the reliability and validity of your study. For instance, you could discuss measures taken to reduce bias, how you ensured that your measures accurately capture what they were intended to, or how you will handle any limitations in your study.
• Ethical Considerations : This is where you state how you have considered ethical issues related to your research, how you have protected the participants’ rights, and how you have complied with the relevant ethical guidelines.
• Limitations : Acknowledge any limitations of your methodology, including any biases and constraints that might have affected your study.
• Summary : Recap the key points of your methodology chapter, highlighting the overall approach and rationalization of your research.

Types of Dissertation Methodology

The type of methodology you choose for your dissertation will depend on the nature of your research question and the field you’re working in. Here are some of the most common types of methodologies used in dissertations:

Experimental Research

This involves creating an experiment that will test your hypothesis. You’ll need to design an experiment, manipulate variables, collect data, and analyze that data to draw conclusions. This is commonly used in fields like psychology, biology, and physics.

Survey Research

This type of research involves gathering data from a large number of participants using tools like questionnaires or surveys. It can be used to collect a large amount of data and is often used in fields like sociology, marketing, and public health.

Qualitative Research

This type of research is used to explore complex phenomena that can’t be easily quantified. Methods include interviews, focus groups, and observations. This methodology is common in fields like anthropology, sociology, and education.

Quantitative Research

Quantitative research uses numerical data to answer research questions. This can include statistical, mathematical, or computational techniques. It’s common in fields like economics, psychology, and health sciences.

Case Study Research

This type of research involves in-depth investigation of a particular case, such as an individual, group, or event. This methodology is often used in psychology, social sciences, and business.

Mixed Methods Research

This combines qualitative and quantitative research methods in a single study. It’s used to answer more complex research questions and is becoming more popular in fields like social sciences, health sciences, and education.

Action Research

This type of research involves taking action and then reflecting upon the results. This cycle of action-reflection-action continues throughout the study. It’s often used in fields like education and organizational development.

Longitudinal Research

This type of research involves studying the same group of individuals over an extended period of time. This could involve surveys, observations, or experiments. It’s common in fields like psychology, sociology, and medicine.

Ethnographic Research

This type of research involves the in-depth study of people and cultures. Researchers immerse themselves in the culture they’re studying to collect data. This is often used in fields like anthropology and social sciences.

Structure of Dissertation Methodology

The structure of a dissertation methodology can vary depending on your field of study, the nature of your research, and the guidelines of your institution. However, a standard structure typically includes the following elements:

• Introduction : Briefly introduce your overall approach to the research. Explain what you plan to explore and why it’s important.
• Research Design/Approach : Describe your overall research design. This can be qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods. Explain the rationale behind your chosen design and why it is suitable for your research questions or hypotheses.
• Data Collection Methods : Detail the methods you used to collect your data. You should include what type of data you collected, how you collected it, and why you chose this method. If relevant, you can also include information about your sample population, such as how many people participated, how they were chosen, and any relevant demographic information.
• Data Analysis Methods : Explain how you plan to analyze your collected data. This will depend on the nature of your data. For example, if you collected quantitative data, you might discuss statistical analysis techniques. If you collected qualitative data, you might discuss coding strategies, thematic analysis, or narrative analysis.
• Reliability and Validity : Discuss how you’ve ensured the reliability and validity of your research. This might include steps you took to reduce bias or increase the accuracy of your measurements.
• Ethical Considerations : If relevant, discuss any ethical issues associated with your research. This might include how you obtained informed consent from participants, how you ensured participants’ privacy and confidentiality, or any potential conflicts of interest.
• Limitations : Acknowledge any limitations in your research methodology. This could include potential sources of bias, difficulties with data collection, or limitations in your analysis methods.
• Summary/Conclusion : Briefly summarize the key points of your methodology, emphasizing how it helps answer your research questions or hypotheses.

How to Write Dissertation Methodology

Writing a dissertation methodology requires you to be clear and precise about the way you’ve carried out your research. It’s an opportunity to convince your readers of the appropriateness and reliability of your approach to your research question. Here is a basic guideline on how to write your methodology section:

1. Introduction

Start your methodology section by restating your research question(s) or objective(s). This ensures your methodology directly ties into the aim of your research.

2. Approach

Identify your overall approach: qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods. Explain why you have chosen this approach.

• Qualitative methods are typically used for exploratory research and involve collecting non-numerical data. This might involve interviews, observations, or analysis of texts.
• Quantitative methods are used for research that relies on numerical data. This might involve surveys, experiments, or statistical analysis.
• Mixed methods use a combination of both qualitative and quantitative research methods.

3. Research Design

Describe the overall design of your research. This could involve explaining the type of study (e.g., case study, ethnography, experimental research, etc.), how you’ve defined and measured your variables, and any control measures you’ve implemented.

4. Data Collection

Explain in detail how you collected your data.

• If you’ve used qualitative methods, you might detail how you selected participants for interviews or focus groups, how you conducted observations, or how you analyzed existing texts.
• If you’ve used quantitative methods, you might detail how you designed your survey or experiment, how you collected responses, and how you ensured your data is reliable and valid.

5. Data Analysis

Describe how you analyzed your data.

• If you’re doing qualitative research, this might involve thematic analysis, discourse analysis, or grounded theory.
• If you’re doing quantitative research, you might be conducting statistical tests, regression analysis, or factor analysis.

Discuss any ethical issues related to your research. This might involve explaining how you obtained informed consent, how you’re protecting participants’ privacy, or how you’re managing any potential harms to participants.

7. Reliability and Validity

Discuss the steps you’ve taken to ensure the reliability and validity of your data.

• Reliability refers to the consistency of your measurements, and you might discuss how you’ve piloted your instruments or used standardized measures.
• Validity refers to the accuracy of your measurements, and you might discuss how you’ve ensured your measures reflect the concepts they’re supposed to measure.

8. Limitations

Every study has its limitations. Discuss the potential weaknesses of your chosen methods and explain any obstacles you faced in your research.

9. Conclusion

Summarize the key points of your methodology, emphasizing how it helps to address your research question or objective.

Example of Dissertation Methodology

An Example of Dissertation Methodology is as follows:

Chapter 3: Methodology

• Introduction

This chapter details the methodology adopted in this research. The study aimed to explore the relationship between stress and productivity in the workplace. A mixed-methods research design was used to collect and analyze data.

Research Design

This study adopted a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative surveys with qualitative interviews to provide a comprehensive understanding of the research problem. The rationale for this approach is that while quantitative data can provide a broad overview of the relationships between variables, qualitative data can provide deeper insights into the nuances of these relationships.

Data Collection Methods

Quantitative Data Collection : An online self-report questionnaire was used to collect data from participants. The questionnaire consisted of two standardized scales: the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) to measure stress levels and the Individual Work Productivity Questionnaire (IWPQ) to measure productivity. The sample consisted of 200 office workers randomly selected from various companies in the city.

Qualitative Data Collection : Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 participants chosen from the initial sample. The interview guide included questions about participants’ experiences with stress and how they perceived its impact on their productivity.

Data Analysis Methods

Quantitative Data Analysis : Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze the survey data. Pearson’s correlation was used to examine the relationship between stress and productivity.

Qualitative Data Analysis : Interviews were transcribed and subjected to thematic analysis using NVivo software. This process allowed for identifying and analyzing patterns and themes regarding the impact of stress on productivity.

Reliability and Validity

To ensure reliability and validity, standardized measures with good psychometric properties were used. In qualitative data analysis, triangulation was employed by having two researchers independently analyze the data and then compare findings.

Ethical Considerations

All participants provided informed consent prior to their involvement in the study. They were informed about the purpose of the study, their rights as participants, and the confidentiality of their responses.

Limitations

The main limitation of this study is its reliance on self-report measures, which can be subject to biases such as social desirability bias. Moreover, the sample was drawn from a single city, which may limit the generalizability of the findings.

Where to Write Dissertation Methodology

In a dissertation or thesis, the Methodology section usually follows the Literature Review. This placement allows the Methodology to build upon the theoretical framework and existing research outlined in the Literature Review, and precedes the Results or Findings section. Here’s a basic outline of how most dissertations are structured:

• Acknowledgements
• Literature Review (or it may be interspersed throughout the dissertation)
• Methodology
• Results/Findings
• References/Bibliography

In the Methodology chapter, you will discuss the research design, data collection methods, data analysis methods, and any ethical considerations pertaining to your study. This allows your readers to understand how your research was conducted and how you arrived at your results.

Advantages of Dissertation Methodology

The dissertation methodology section plays an important role in a dissertation for several reasons. Here are some of the advantages of having a well-crafted methodology section in your dissertation:

• Clarifies Your Research Approach : The methodology section explains how you plan to tackle your research question, providing a clear plan for data collection and analysis.
• Enables Replication : A detailed methodology allows other researchers to replicate your study. Replication is an important aspect of scientific research because it provides validation of the study’s results.
• Demonstrates Rigor : A well-written methodology shows that you’ve thought critically about your research methods and have chosen the most appropriate ones for your research question. This adds credibility to your study.
• Enhances Transparency : Detailing your methods allows readers to understand the steps you took in your research. This increases the transparency of your study and allows readers to evaluate potential biases or limitations.
• Helps in Addressing Research Limitations : In your methodology section, you can acknowledge and explain the limitations of your research. This is important as it shows you understand that no research method is perfect and there are always potential weaknesses.
• Facilitates Peer Review : A detailed methodology helps peer reviewers assess the soundness of your research design. This is an important part of the publication process if you aim to publish your dissertation in a peer-reviewed journal.
• Establishes the Validity and Reliability : Your methodology section should also include a discussion of the steps you took to ensure the validity and reliability of your measurements, which is crucial for establishing the overall quality of your research.

About the author

Muhammad Hassan

Researcher, Academic Writer, Web developer

You may also like

Thesis Outline – Example, Template and Writing...

Implications in Research – Types, Examples and...

Research Methodology – Types, Examples and...

Thesis Statement – Examples, Writing Guide

Dissertation – Format, Example and Template

Limitations in Research – Types, Examples and...

How To Write The Methodology Chapter

A plain-language explainer – with practical examples.

Overview: The Methodology Chapter

• The purpose  of the methodology chapter
• Why you need to craft this chapter (really) well
• How to write and structure the chapter
• Methodology chapter example
• Essential takeaways

What (exactly) is the methodology chapter?

The methodology chapter is where you outline the philosophical foundations of your research and detail the specific methodological choices you’ve made. In other words, the purpose of this chapter is to explain exactly how you designed your study and, just as importantly, why you made those choices.

Your methodology chapter should comprehensively describe and justify all the methodological decisions involved in your study. For instance, the research approach you took (qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods), your sampling strategy (who you collected data from), how you gathered your data, and how you analysed it. If that sounds a bit daunting, don’t worry – we’ll walk you through all these methodological aspects in this post .

Why is the methodology chapter important?

The methodology chapter plays two important roles in your dissertation or thesis:

Firstly, it demonstrates your understanding of research theory, which is what earns you marks. A flawed research design or methodology would mean flawed results. So, this chapter is vital as it allows you to show the marker that you know what you’re doing and that your results are credible .

Secondly, the methodology chapter is what helps to make your study replicable. In other words, it allows other researchers to undertake your study using the same methodological approach, and compare their findings to yours. This is very important within academic research, as each study builds on previous studies.

The methodology chapter is also important in that it allows you to identify and discuss any methodological issues or problems you encountered (i.e., research limitations ), and to explain how you mitigated the impacts of these.

Now, it’s important to understand that every research project has its limitations , so it’s important to acknowledge these openly and highlight your study’s value despite its limitations . Doing so demonstrates your understanding of research design, which will earn you marks. 

Need a helping hand?

How to write up the methodology chapter

Before you start writing, it’s always a good idea to draw up a rough outline to guide your writing. Don’t just start writing without knowing what you’ll discuss where. If you do, you’ll likely end up with a disjointed, ill-flowing narrative . You’ll then waste a lot of time rewriting in an attempt to try to stitch all the pieces together. Do yourself a favour and start with the end in mind .

Section 1 – Introduction

As with all chapters in your dissertation or thesis, the methodology chapter should have a brief introduction. In this section, you should remind your readers what the focus of your study is, especially the research aims . As we’ve discussed many times on the blog, your methodology needs to align with your research aims, objectives and research questions. Therefore, it’s useful to frontload this component to remind the reader (and yourself!) what you’re trying to achieve.

Section 2 – The Methodology

The next section of your chapter is where you’ll present the actual methodology. In this section, you need to detail and justify the key methodological choices you’ve made in a logical, intuitive fashion. Importantly, this is the heart of your methodology chapter, so you need to get specific – don’t hold back on the details here. This is not one of those “less is more” situations.

Let’s take a look at the most common components you’ll likely need to cover.

Methodological Choice #1 – Research Philosophy

Research philosophy refers to the underlying beliefs (i.e., the worldview) regarding how data about a phenomenon should be gathered , analysed and used . The research philosophy will serve as the core of your study and underpin all of the other research design choices, so it’s critically important that you understand which philosophy you’ll adopt and why you made that choice. If you’re not clear on this, take the time to get clarity before you make any further methodological choices.

While several research philosophies exist, two commonly adopted ones are positivism and interpretivism . These two sit roughly on opposite sides of the research philosophy spectrum.

Positivism states that the researcher can observe reality objectively and that there is only one reality, which exists independently of the observer. As a consequence, it is quite commonly the underlying research philosophy in quantitative studies and is oftentimes the assumed philosophy in the physical sciences.

Contrasted with this, interpretivism , which is often the underlying research philosophy in qualitative studies, assumes that the researcher performs a role in observing the world around them and that reality is unique to each observer . In other words, reality is observed subjectively .

These are just two philosophies (there are many more), but they demonstrate significantly different approaches to research and have a significant impact on all the methodological choices. Therefore, it’s vital that you clearly outline and justify your research philosophy at the beginning of your methodology chapter, as it sets the scene for everything that follows.

The next thing you would typically discuss in your methodology section is the research type. The starting point for this is to indicate whether the research you conducted is inductive or deductive .

Inductive research takes a bottom-up approach , where the researcher begins with specific observations or data and then draws general conclusions or theories from those observations. Therefore these studies tend to be exploratory in terms of approach.

Conversely , d eductive research takes a top-down approach , where the researcher starts with a theory or hypothesis and then tests it using specific observations or data. Therefore these studies tend to be confirmatory in approach.

Related to this, you’ll need to indicate whether your study adopts a qualitative, quantitative or mixed  approach. As we’ve mentioned, there’s a strong link between this choice and your research philosophy, so make sure that your choices are tightly aligned . When you write this section up, remember to clearly justify your choices, as they form the foundation of your study.

Methodological Choice #3 – Research Strategy

Next, you’ll need to discuss your research strategy (also referred to as a research design ). This methodological choice refers to the broader strategy in terms of how you’ll conduct your research, based on the aims of your study.

Several research strategies exist, including experimental , case studies , ethnography , grounded theory, action research , and phenomenology . Let’s take a look at two of these, experimental and ethnographic, to see how they contrast.

Experimental research makes use of the scientific method , where one group is the control group (in which no variables are manipulated ) and another is the experimental group (in which a specific variable is manipulated). This type of research is undertaken under strict conditions in a controlled, artificial environment (e.g., a laboratory). By having firm control over the environment, experimental research typically allows the researcher to establish causation between variables. Therefore, it can be a good choice if you have research aims that involve identifying causal relationships.

Ethnographic research , on the other hand, involves observing and capturing the experiences and perceptions of participants in their natural environment (for example, at home or in the office). In other words, in an uncontrolled environment.  Naturally, this means that this research strategy would be far less suitable if your research aims involve identifying causation, but it would be very valuable if you’re looking to explore and examine a group culture, for example.

The next thing you’ll need to detail in your methodology chapter is the time horizon. There are two options here: cross-sectional and longitudinal . In other words, whether the data for your study were all collected at one point in time (cross-sectional) or at multiple points in time (longitudinal).

The choice you make here depends again on your research aims, objectives and research questions. If, for example, you aim to assess how a specific group of people’s perspectives regarding a topic change over time , you’d likely adopt a longitudinal time horizon.

Another important factor to consider is simply whether you have the time necessary to adopt a longitudinal approach (which could involve collecting data over multiple months or even years). Oftentimes, the time pressures of your degree program will force your hand into adopting a cross-sectional time horizon, so keep this in mind.

Methodological Choice #5 – Sampling Strategy

Next, you’ll need to discuss your sampling strategy . There are two main categories of sampling, probability and non-probability sampling.

Probability sampling involves a random (and therefore representative) selection of participants from a population, whereas non-probability sampling entails selecting participants in a non-random  (and therefore non-representative) manner. For example, selecting participants based on ease of access (this is called a convenience sample).

The right sampling approach depends largely on what you’re trying to achieve in your study. Specifically, whether you trying to develop findings that are generalisable to a population or not. Practicalities and resource constraints also play a large role here, as it can oftentimes be challenging to gain access to a truly random sample. In the video below, we explore some of the most common sampling strategies. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fSmedyVv-Us Video can't be loaded because JavaScript is disabled: Sampling Methods 101: Probability & Non-Probability Sampling Explained Simply (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fSmedyVv-Us) Methodological Choice #6 – Data Collection Method

Next up, you’ll need to explain how you’ll go about collecting the necessary data for your study. Your data collection method (or methods) will depend on the type of data that you plan to collect – in other words, qualitative or quantitative data.

Typically, quantitative research relies on surveys , data generated by lab equipment, analytics software or existing datasets. Qualitative research, on the other hand, often makes use of collection methods such as interviews , focus groups , participant observations, and ethnography.

So, as you can see, there is a tight link between this section and the design choices you outlined in earlier sections. Strong alignment between these sections, as well as your research aims and questions is therefore very important.

Methodological Choice #7 – Data Analysis Methods/Techniques

The final major methodological choice that you need to address is that of analysis techniques . In other words, how you’ll go about analysing your date once you’ve collected it. Here it’s important to be very specific about your analysis methods and/or techniques – don’t leave any room for interpretation. Also, as with all choices in this chapter, you need to justify each choice you make.

With the key methodological choices outlined and justified, the next step is to discuss the limitations of your design. No research methodology is perfect – there will always be trade-offs between the “ideal” methodology and what’s practical and viable, given your constraints. Therefore, this section of your methodology chapter is where you’ll discuss the trade-offs you had to make, and why these were justified given the context.

Methodological limitations can vary greatly from study to study, ranging from common issues such as time and budget constraints to issues of sample or selection bias . For example, you may find that you didn’t manage to draw in enough respondents to achieve the desired sample size (and therefore, statistically significant results), or your sample may be skewed heavily towards a certain demographic, thereby negatively impacting representativeness .

In this section, it’s important to be critical of the shortcomings of your study. There’s no use trying to hide them (your marker will be aware of them regardless). By being critical, you’ll demonstrate to your marker that you have a strong understanding of research theory, so don’t be shy here. At the same time, don’t beat your study to death . State the limitations, why these were justified, how you mitigated their impacts to the best degree possible, and how your study still provides value despite these limitations .

Section 4 – Concluding Summary

Finally, it’s time to wrap up the methodology chapter with a brief concluding summary. In this section, you’ll want to concisely summarise what you’ve presented in the chapter. Here, it can be a good idea to use a figure to summarise the key decisions, especially if your university recommends using a specific model (for example, Saunders’ Research Onion ).

Methodology Chapter Example

Wrapping up.

Also, remember the golden rule of the methodology chapter – justify every choice ! Make sure that you clearly explain the “why” for every “what”, and reference credible methodology textbooks or academic sources to back up your justifications.

Learn More About Methodology

Triangulation: The Ultimate Credibility Enhancer

Triangulation is one of the best ways to enhance the credibility of your research. Learn about the different options here.

Research Limitations 101: What You Need To Know

Learn everything you need to know about research limitations (AKA limitations of the study). Includes practical examples from real studies.

In Vivo Coding 101: Full Explainer With Examples

Learn about in vivo coding, a popular qualitative coding technique ideal for studies where the nuances of language are central to the aims.

Process Coding 101: Full Explainer With Examples

Learn about process coding, a popular qualitative coding technique ideal for studies exploring processes, actions and changes over time.

Qualitative Coding 101: Inductive, Deductive & Hybrid Coding

Inductive, Deductive & Abductive Coding Qualitative Coding Approaches Explained...

📄 FREE TEMPLATES

Research Topic Ideation

Proposal Writing

Literature Review

Methodology & Analysis

Academic Writing

Referencing & Citing

Apps, Tools & Tricks

The Grad Coach Podcast

55 Comments

highly appreciated.

This was very helpful!

This was helpful

Thanks ,it is a very useful idea.

Thanks ,it is very useful idea.

Thank you so much, this information is very useful.

Thank you very much. I must say the information presented was succinct, coherent and invaluable. It is well put together and easy to comprehend. I have a great guide to create the research methodology for my dissertation.

Highly clear and useful.

I understand a bit on the explanation above. I want to have some coach but I’m still student and don’t have any budget to hire one. A lot of question I want to ask.

Thank you so much. This concluded my day plan. Thank you so much.

Thanks it was helpful

Great information. It would be great though if you could show us practical examples.

Thanks so much for this information. God bless and be with you

Thank you so so much. Indeed it was helpful

This is EXCELLENT!

I was totally confused by other explanations. Thank you so much!.

justdoing my research now , thanks for the guidance.

Thank uuuu! These contents are really valued for me!

This is powerful …I really like it

Highly useful and clear, thank you so much.

Highly appreciated. Good guide

That was helpful. Thanks

This is very useful.Thank you

Very helpful information. Thank you

This is exactly what I was looking for. The explanation is so detailed and easy to comprehend. Well done and thank you.

Great job. You just summarised everything in the easiest and most comprehensible way possible. Thanks a lot.

Thank you very much for the ideas you have given this will really help me a lot. Thank you and God Bless.

Such great effort …….very grateful thank you

Please accept my sincere gratitude. I have to say that the information that was delivered was congruent, concise, and quite helpful. It is clear and straightforward, making it simple to understand. I am in possession of an excellent manual that will assist me in developing the research methods for my dissertation.

Thank you for your great explanation. It really helped me construct my methodology paper.

thank you for simplifieng the methodoly, It was realy helpful

Very helpful!

Thank you for your great explanation.

The explanation I have been looking for. So clear Thank you

Thank you very much .this was more enlightening.

helped me create the in depth and thorough methodology for my dissertation

Thank you for the great explaination.please construct one methodology for me

I appreciate you for the explanation of methodology. Please construct one methodology on the topic: The effects influencing students dropout among schools for my thesis

This helped me complete my methods section of my dissertation with ease. I have managed to write a thorough and concise methodology!

its so good in deed

wow …what an easy to follow presentation. very invaluable content shared. utmost important.

Peace be upon you, I am Dr. Ahmed Khedr, a former part-time professor at Al-Azhar University in Cairo, Egypt. I am currently teaching research methods, and I have been dealing with your esteemed site for several years, and I found that despite my long experience with research methods sites, it is one of the smoothest sites for evaluating the material for students, For this reason, I relied on it a lot in teaching and translated most of what was written into Arabic and published it on my own page on Facebook. Thank you all… Everything I posted on my page is provided with the names of the writers of Grad coach, the title of the article, and the site. My best regards.

A remarkably simple and useful guide, thank you kindly.

I real appriciate your short and remarkable chapter summary

Bravo! Very helpful guide.

Only true experts could provide such helpful, fantastic, and inspiring knowledge about Methodology. Thank you very much! God be with you and us all!

highly appreciate your effort.

This is a very well thought out post. Very informative and a great read.

THANKS SO MUCH FOR SHARING YOUR NICE IDEA

I love you Emma, you are simply amazing with clear explanations with complete information. GradCoach really helped me to do my assignment here in Auckland. Mostly, Emma make it so simple and enjoyable

Thank you very much for this informative and synthesised version.

thank you, It was a very informative presentation, you made it just to the point in a straightforward way .

Help me write a methodology on the topic “challenges faced by family businesses in Ghana

Well articulated, clear, and concise. I got a lot from this writings. Thanks

Submit a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Submit Comment

• Print Friendly

Guidelines For Writing A Psychology Dissertation

Writing a psychology dissertation requires a meticulous process. Begin with an original, engaging topic that contributes new insights. Conduct a comprehensive literature review to lay the groundwork for your research based on existing scholarship. Propose a clear, feasible research question and design an appropriate methodology for data collection, whether through experiments, surveys, or case studies. Throughout, maintain rigorous data analysis and interpretation to effectively argue your findings. Ensure thorough editing, proofreading, and adherence to academic standards, particularly in formatting and citations. By following these guidelines, you equip yourself to craft a dissertation that not only meets but exceeds academic expectations, paving the way for further exploration in the field of psychology.

• Choose a subject that offers fresh perspectives in psychology and matches your interests.
• Use a combination of qualitative and quantitative research methods that are appropriate for your study.
• Organise your dissertation with distinct sections: introduction, literature review, methodology, results, and discussion.
• Make sure to correctly reference all sources following APA guidelines to uphold academic honesty.
• Take advantage of feedback from mentors and colleagues to improve your work and fill any gaps.

Understanding the Dissertation Process

Understanding the dissertation process is crucial for psychology students in the UK starting on this significant scholarly journey. It involves determining the structure of the dissertation, identifying key stages from proposal to defence, and understanding expectations at each phase. This discussion aims to outline the psychology dissertation process and the critical stages involved, providing a clear roadmap for students.

The process begins with the selection of a topic, which should be both original and of interest to the student. Following this, a thorough literature review must be conducted to frame the research question within the context of existing research. The proposal stage follows, requiring the student to outline their intended research methodology and objectives.

Once the proposal has been approved, the research phase commences. This involves collecting data through various methods such as experiments, surveys, or case studies. The data collected must then be analysed and interpreted in relation to the initial research question.

The writing phase is next, where the student drafts the dissertation, presenting their findings and discussing their implications in the wider field of psychology. This phase demands a high level of academic writing and the ability to critically evaluate one's own work and that of others.

Finally, the defence or viva voce is where the student presents and defends their dissertation before an academic panel . Success at this stage signifies the completion of the dissertation process.

Throughout each phase, students are encouraged to seek feedback from their supervisors and peers to refine their work. Adhering to a structured process and maintaining open communication with supervisors are key to navigating the dissertation journey successfully.

What is the Psychology Dissertation Process?

Commencing the psychology dissertation process is a crucial milestone in a postgraduate student's academic journey, requiring thorough planning, research, and implementation. This initial phase involves selecting a topic that not only ignites interest but also adds value to the field of psychology.

The process begins by identifying a captivating research question that fills a gap or presents a fresh perspective within the chosen area. Crafting a well-thought-out dissertation proposal is the subsequent essential step. This document details the proposed study, highlighting its significance, methodology , and potential impact .

The proposal serves as a roadmap for the research journey and ensures it is in line with the student's academic and professional aspirations , ultimately striving to enhance the welfare of individuals and communities.

Key Stages of the Dissertation Process

The dissertation process in psychology consists of several crucial stages, each playing a vital role in the successful completion of this extensive academic project.

Understanding these stages not only clarifies the dissertation process but also enables aspiring psychologists to make a significant contribution to the field, ultimately supporting the improvement of mental health support and interventions.

What does a dissertation require?

Undertaking a psychology dissertation requires careful attention to time management and strict adherence to deadlines. Recognising the importance of making consistent progress is crucial for systematically working towards the final goal. This section explores the essential aspects of effective time management and the impacts of following a schedule on the successful completion of a dissertation.

Managing your time well involves planning your activities in advance and setting realistic deadlines for each stage of your research and writing process. It is also important to allocate specific times for reading, data collection, analysis, and writing, ensuring that each task is given the necessary attention.

Staying on track involves regularly reviewing your progress against your plan. If you start to fall behind, it is important to adjust your schedule or methods to catch up. The ability to adapt and overcome obstacles is vital in maintaining momentum towards completing your dissertation.

Effective time management not only helps in meeting deadlines but also reduces stress, enabling a clearer focus on the quality of work. Through disciplined planning and execution, the aim of successfully completing a dissertation becomes much more achievable.

Time Management and Meeting Deadlines

Managing time efficiently is crucial for successfully meeting the tight deadlines that a psychology dissertation requires. Good time management not only ensures that you stay on schedule but also helps in setting achievable goals, which are essential in completing any significant academic project.

Here are key strategies to enhance your time management skills and meet deadlines:

• Prioritise tasks based on their importance and deadline.
• Break down large tasks into smaller, more manageable parts.
• Set specific, achievable targets for each study session.
• Use a diary or digital calendar to keep track of deadlines and progress.
• Regularly review and adjust your plan as necessary to remain on track.

This approach is essential for academic success, offering a structured way to effectively manage your workload.

Why is it important to stay on course?

Maintaining momentum in your dissertation journey is crucial because of the detailed nature of research and analysis required in psychology. Staying on track helps facilitate a more streamlined writing process, providing ample time for editing and proofreading . These steps are essential for enhancing the quality and coherence of your work.

Choosing Your Topic and Research Question

Selecting an appropriate topic and formulating a precise research question are essential steps in creating a compelling psychology dissertation . This section provides strategies for choosing a suitable topic, guidance on developing a research question, and an overview of prevalent themes within the field. The significance of a dissertation proposal is also discussed, alongside different research methods that may be utilised.

Choosing a topic requires careful consideration and alignment with your interests and the field's current research gaps. A focused research question then guides the scope and direction of your study. Popular themes in psychology might include cognitive processes , mental health issues , behavioural patterns , and social interactions , among others.

A well-crafted dissertation proposal outlines your intended research, demonstrating its relevance and your methodological approach. This step is crucial for gaining approval from your academic supervisors and ensuring a clear plan for your study.

Regarding research methods, qualitative, quantitative, or mixed approaches can be adopted, depending on the nature of your question and the specific requirements of your study. Each method has its strengths and can provide different insights into psychological phenomena.

How to Choose a Topic for your Psychology Dissertation?

Choosing a topic for your psychology dissertation is a crucial initial step that lays the groundwork for your research endeavours. When selecting a topic for your psychology dissertation, adhere to the following principles:

• Opt for a topic that resonates with your interests and future professional aspirations, to maintain your engagement and motivation.
• Evaluate the practicality of the topic regarding the available research methods and resources.
• Ensure the topic contributes something new to the field, steering clear of overly general subjects.
• Take into account the ethical considerations and comply with ethical standards.
• Solicit advice from mentors and colleagues to refine your choice of topic.

Could you help me select a research question, please?

Once you have chosen an interesting topic for your psychology dissertation, the next important step is to create a specific research question to guide your investigation. Selecting a research question is a key part of planning your research project, as it will influence your hypothesis and methodology. This process requires careful thought to make sure your question is relevant and original.

Choosing the right question is crucial for laying a strong foundation for your research project.

What are some popular dissertation topics in psychology?

In the field of psychology, there is a wide range of dissertation topics available, each offering a unique chance for study and adding to the field. When undertaking psychology research, selecting a dissertation topic that captures your interest and can benefit others is very fulfilling.

Here are some popular dissertation topics to consider:

• The impact of social media on mental health
• Cognitive-behavioural therapy and its effectiveness in treating depression
• The psychology of decision-making in high-pressure situations
• The role of emotional intelligence in workplace productivity
• Neuropsychological assessment of learning disabilities in children

Each of these topics provides a great opportunity for both qualitative and quantitative analysis, offering numerous chances to gain insights and contribute valuable findings that can aid others through your psychology research.

The Role of a Dissertation Proposal

Creating a dissertation proposal is a vital stage in the research process, serving as a detailed blueprint that guides the selection of your topic and the formation of your research question . This document is not just a formal requirement but a key element that outlines your research methodology, showcasing its potential to enhance and expand upon existing scholarship . It signifies your initial foray into independent research , requiring a deep understanding of the current academic discourse to identify gaps your study intends to explore. Therefore, the dissertation proposal offers a chance to demonstrate your commitment to enriching the academic community by delving into areas that have not yet been explored or have been insufficiently studied, setting the stage for a research endeavour that could offer new perspectives and solutions in psychology.

This necessitates not only familiarity with the literature but also the ability to suggest a methodology that is both robust and innovative. The proposal should clearly define the aims and the importance of your research , presenting a compelling case for why your study is essential and how it will contribute to the existing body of knowledge in the field. Furthermore, it should outline the techniques you intend to use for data collection and analysis, demonstrating a considered approach to addressing your research question.

Your proposal is also an exercise in academic writing , requiring clear, precise language and adherence to disciplinary norms . It provides an opportunity to fine-tune your ideas and arguments, receiving feedback that can refine your research focus . Ultimately, the dissertation proposal is more than just a stage in your academic journey; it showcases your ability to conduct thorough research and make a meaningful contribution to your field.

Psychology Research Methods You Can Consider

Selecting a suitable research method is crucial when deciding on your psychology dissertation topic and formulating your research question. Psychology research methods you can consider include:

• Qualitative methods such as interviews and case studies, which allow for a detailed examination of individual experiences.
• Surveys and questionnaires to collect and analyse data from larger populations.
• Experimental designs to establish causality between variables.
• Observational studies for understanding behaviour in natural settings.
• Content analysis for exploring patterns in written or spoken material.

Each method offers unique insights and challenges, requiring careful thought on how best to investigate the complexities of human behaviour. By choosing the right approach, you can ensure your psychological research makes a meaningful contribution to the field and to the well-being of others.

Structure and Components of a Psychology Dissertation

Progressing with the creation of a psychology dissertation , it is essential to understand the structure and necessary components for a coherent and scholarly piece. This section will highlight important elements including creating an engaging title page , organising effectively through a detailed table of contents and appendix , and meticulous document formatting .

Additionally, the significance of a comprehensive bibliography and reference list will be discussed to preserve the integrity and credibility of the dissertation.

In the UK, following specific spelling and grammatical conventions is crucial. This involves correctly organising content to enhance readability and scholarly communication . The title page should capture the essence of the dissertation, encouraging further investigation. An organised table of contents and appendix help create an easily navigable document, which is vital for academic scrutiny. Formatting must adhere to prescribed academic standards to ensure consistency throughout the work.

The bibliography and reference list are fundamental in maintaining academic integrity , showcasing a thorough engagement with existing literature and providing a basis for verifying the cited sources. This meticulous attention to the foundational elements of a dissertation not only enhances its academic value but also bolsters the author's credibility within the scholarly community.

Presented in an instructive manner, this guidance aims to provide UK secondary school and A-Level students with a clear understanding of the expectations for a well-structured psychology dissertation. Through varied sentence structures and precise vocabulary, this section seeks to convey essential information concisely, laying a strong foundation for the dissertation writing process.

Creating an Attention-Grabbing Cover Page

The title page of a psychology dissertation is the first point of contact, setting the scene for the scholarly exploration contained within. Following the guidelines of the American Psychological Association gives your dissertation a professional appearance. A carefully prepared title page not only follows these guidelines but also shows your dedication to contributing to others through your research.

Key elements include:

• The dissertation title: should be clear and concise
• Your name: as the author
• Institutional affiliation: location of the research
• Degree programme: indicating your area of study
• Submission date: the presentation date of the dissertation

These components, organised according to APA standards, ensure that your psychology dissertation's title page effectively captures interest, establishing a professional and scholarly precedent.

Structuring the Dissertation: How To Go About it

A well-organised psychology dissertation acts as the foundation of your academic work, guiding readers through your research journey with clear purpose. For psychology students, structuring the dissertation involves carefully organising various sections that together present your research narrative. This organisation not only supports the logical progression of your argument but also ensures that your findings and analyses are clear and understandable.

A well-structured psychology dissertation is essential for guiding the reader smoothly through the complexities of your research, ensuring each part is clearly understood and contributes to the overall argument. The introduction, literature review, methodology, and appendix are key components that, when effectively organised, provide a solid foundation for presenting your scholarly work.

Importance of Bibliography and Reference List

The bibliography and reference list are crucial components of any psychology dissertation, serving as the cornerstone for academic integrity and scholarly communication. Proper citation of all sources enhances the credibility of your work and demonstrates respect for the contributions of other researchers. The APA format offers a standardized method for citing sources, enhancing the clarity and consistency of your dissertation.

Correctly citing all sources is essential to avoid plagiarism. The APA style is recommended for consistency and professionalism. A bibliography showcases the scope of your research, while a reference list provides a roadmap for your scholarly journey. This aids interested readers in further research and exploration.

By adhering to these guidelines, you ensure that your work is both respected and valuable in the continuous pursuit of knowledge and serving others.

Organising Your Content: Table of Contents and Appendix

Ensuring your psychology dissertation is logically structured is essential for guiding your readers effectively. A well-organised table of contents and appendices act as clear maps through your research. When composing a psychology dissertation, it's not simply a matter of meeting an academic requirement but making a significant contribution to a discipline focused on understanding and aiding individuals. Using tips for dissertations and online tools can enhance the clarity and functionality of your tables and figures. These components should not just exist; they must clearly convey and support the significance of your research.

This format guides your audience through your dissertation, demonstrating your dedication to clarity and usefulness.

Correct Formatting of the Dissertation

Mastering the correct formatting of your psychology dissertation is crucial for presenting your research in a clear, professional manner. Adhering to the required format not only shows your attention to detail but also respects the academic standards of your field.

When structuring your dissertation, consider the following guidelines:

• Maintain consistent use of citation styles throughout your document.
• Accurately place page numbers to aid in navigation.
• Organise headings and subheadings for clarity and ease of reading.
• Include a references section formatted according to your department's guidelines.
• Incorporate all essential components: abstract, introduction, methodology, outcomes, discussion, and summary.

This approach ensures your work is presented effectively, adhering to the high academic standards expected within the field of psychology.

Undertaking Your Dissertation Research

Initiating your research for a dissertation in psychology involves a precise understanding of its aims, the choice of suitable methods and design, and the ability to conduct thorough literature reviews. This stage distinguishes between qualitative and quantitative research methods , highlighting the importance of methodical precision . The process of writing your dissertation then focuses on the accurate analysis and interpretation of your findings, embedding them within the existing scholarly literature .

In the UK, adhering to appropriate English spellings and grammatical structures is crucial for academic writing. This involves understanding the nuances of methodology in your research, which is a crucial aspect of your dissertation. Your skill in critically evaluating and synthesising the literature in your field will aid in the development of your research question and the selection of research methods that are most suitable for your study.

The design of your study, whether it involves experimental, correlational, or observational methods , must be carefully planned to effectively address your research question. This planning includes considering ethical implications , ensuring the reliability and validity of your measures, and being ready for potential limitations in your study.

As you progress with your research, maintaining an organised approach to collecting and analysing your data is essential. This will help in a clearer interpretation of the results, allowing you to draw conclusions that are supported by the data and relevant literature.

Aims of Psychology Dissertation Research

The main goal of psychology dissertation research is to progress the field by exploring uncharted territories or offering new perspectives on existing theories and practices. This process is thorough, with the chosen type of research having a substantial impact on the study's breadth and influence.

Dissertation research encourages students to:

• Analyse existing literature to identify gaps or unresolved issues.
• Develop hypotheses that effectively address these gaps.
• Plan and carry out studies to rigorously test these hypotheses.
• Collect and analyse data to support or challenge their hypotheses.
• Suggest future research directions based on their findings.

This task requires a detailed and systematic approach, ensuring that contributions are both meaningful and pertinent to the field of psychology.

Approaches and Study Design

Having established the objectives for a psychology dissertation research, it is now important to focus on the methods and research design, which are crucial for conducting impactful studies.

Creating your dissertation requires a deep understanding of the methods most suitable for your research questions. Selecting the appropriate research design is essential as it dictates how data will be gathered, analysed, and interpreted. This stage is not just about meeting academic requirements but is about making a significant contribution to the field of psychology.

The chosen methods should align with the aims of your research, ensuring that your study can effectively address the questions you want to explore. To serve others through your research, it is essential to implement a strong research design and methods.

How to Carry Out an In-depth Literature Review of Existing Literature?

Carrying out a thorough literature review is essential, as it forms the basis upon which your dissertation research is developed. This entails a detailed analysis of existing studies and theories relevant to your topic. Writing a dissertation involves a thorough exploration of both traditional and modern literature to fully understand your research area. Here are some key strategies:

• Use academic databases and online resources to access current studies.
• Focus on peer-reviewed journals and authoritative texts.
• Organise your findings thematically to make synthesis easier.
• Critically evaluate the methodology and results of previous works.
• Keep up to date with recent publications to ensure your work remains relevant.

Embarking on the challenge of writing a dissertation is a substantial task, requiring careful examination of existing literature to establish a strong academic and practical foundation for your research.

Distinguishing Between Qualitative and Quantitative Research

After conducting a thorough review of the literature, it is essential to distinguish between qualitative and quantitative research methods in your dissertation research. This differentiation is crucial at this stage of the dissertation as it guides your writing and editing efforts.

Qualitative research involves investigating behaviours, perceptions, and experiences and is particularly useful for studies that seek to understand the nuances of psychological phenomena. On the other hand, quantitative research enables the measurement and analysis of data in a structured way, providing a different perspective on your research area.

When drafting your dissertation, understanding these methodologies will help identify areas for improvement, ensuring that your research is impactful and carried out with precision, ultimately making a significant contribution to the field of psychology.

Writing Your Dissertation: The Importance of Analysis

Exploring the core of your dissertation, the analysis phase emerges as a crucial point where data is transformed into valuable insights, crafting the narrative of your research outcomes. Acknowledging the complexity of the dissertation, this stage is key to:

• Ensuring the data collected robustly supports your hypothesis.
• Identifying patterns and themes vital for the foundation of your argument.
• Highlighting the need for meticulous editing and revision for clarity.
• Providing a guide to help you write an engaging narrative for your audience.
• Showing the relevance of your findings within the wider context of psychology.

This analytical process not only assists in effectively completing the dissertation but also guarantees that your contribution to the field is insightful, impactful, and beneficial to the greater good.

Edit, Revise and Proofread

Upon completing your first draft of a psychology dissertation, the next step involves comprehensive editing , revising, and proofreading to enhance clarity, coherence, and academic integrity.

This stage is vital for refining your arguments and ensuring adherence to APA style , including techniques to prevent plagiarism , a crucial aspect of academic writing.

Mastering these processes is crucial for a successful dissertation defence, emphasising their importance in your academic endeavours.

Effective Techniques for Editing and Revising Your Dissertation

Editing and revising your dissertation are vital steps in refining your work to adhere to the highest academic standards. These phases guarantee your document is devoid of typographical errors, plagiarism is properly addressed, and you present a well-structured dissertation that reflects your commitment to contributing to others through your research.

To improve the quality of your dissertation, consider these techniques:

• Divide your revision into manageable sections.
• Solicit feedback from peers or mentors who are knowledgeable about your field.
• Employ software tools for grammar and plagiarism checks.
• Read your work aloud to detect awkward phrasing.
• Allocate time between revisions to view your work with a fresh perspective.

Adhering to these strategies will not only elevate the calibre of your dissertation but also ensure it meets the rigorous standards expected in academic circles.

The Importance of Proofreading

Building upon the foundation set by editing and revising, proofreading acts as the critical final step to guarantee your dissertation is refined and devoid of errors. Paying close attention to detail at this stage significantly influences the credibility and legibility of your work. In the dissertation journey, proofreading transcends merely identifying typographical mistakes . It involves an exhaustive review of grammar, consistency in style and format, and verifying the clarity of your arguments. This diligent process highlights your commitment to excellence and respect for the academic community to which you aim to contribute. A successful dissertation mirrors the effort and dedication invested throughout the process, establishing proofreading as an essential element in presenting a scholarly and impactful piece of research.

The emphasis on UK English ensures that all spellings and grammatical structures adhere to the conventions preferred in the United Kingdom. This adherence not only enhances the document's coherence but also aligns it with the expectations of UK-based academic institutions . The avoidance of specific terms and phrases ensures the text remains focused and devoid of unnecessary jargon, making it accessible to a broad academic audience, including those at the A-Level or advanced secondary school level. The instructional tone , combined with a varied sentence structure and precise vocabulary, facilitates a clear and authoritative guide on the importance of proofreading in the academic writing process.

How to Avoid Plagiarism?

Understanding the subtle interplay between editing, revising, and proofreading is key to ensuring your dissertation avoids plagiarism. These processes guarantee the originality of your work and proper citation of research sources. To communicate your findings clearly and serve your audience well, consider the following strategies:

• Review each chapter or section meticulously to ensure ideas are accurately attributed.
• Use software tools specifically designed to assist in correctly citing sources.
• Include an introductory and concluding section that summarises your findings, rather than merely those of others.
• Frequently compare your text with sources to prevent unintentional copying.
• Seek feedback from mentors or colleagues on the originality of your work.

This approach ensures that your dissertation is both original and respectful of the intellectual contributions of others, while effectively communicating your research to your intended audience.

Using APA Style for Your Dissertation

Adopting the APA style for your dissertation ensures a standardised format for editing, revising and proofreading, promoting clarity and coherence throughout your document.

This style, recommended by the Modern Language Association , provides thorough assistance with all aspects of your writing, from structure to citation, ensuring that your work meets the highest academic standards .

By utilising resources like PsycINFO , you have access to an extensive database that further supports your research, allowing you to visualise and incorporate relevant findings effectively.

The APA style's systematic approach to documentation and presentation not only aids in the clear expression of your ideas but also in the professional presentation of your work, aligning with your aim to contribute positively through your research.

Preparing for Your Dissertation Defence

Preparing for your dissertation defence demands careful editing, revision, and proofreading to present your work in the best light. As you prepare for this vital stage in completing your psychology dissertation, remember to adhere to any specific dissertation guidelines set by your university.

• Review feedback: Integrate suggestions and corrections from your adviser and committee.
• Practice your presentation: Simulate the defence environment to build confidence.
• Check formatting: Confirm compliance with your university's guidelines.
• Seek external proofreading: An external perspective can spot errors you might miss.
• Prepare for questions: Predict committee questions and prepare your answers.

Ensure all preparations are made with attention to detail, reflecting the high standards expected in academic work, particularly within the UK context.

Online Dissertations Psychology Tuition

Recommended articles for Dissertations Psychology

How To Choose The Best Dissertation Topic For Psychology?

How To Create An Effective Outline For Psychology Dissertations

Writing A Psychology Dissertation Tips And Tricks

Mastering Psychology Advice For Writing A Dissertation

A service you can depend on

The quickest way to talk with us

Email us at [email protected]

Our partners

We are proud partners of TheProfs and BitPaper

Purdue Online Writing Lab Purdue OWL® College of Liberal Arts

APA Sample Paper: Experimental Psychology

Welcome to the Purdue OWL

This page is brought to you by the OWL at Purdue University. When printing this page, you must include the entire legal notice.

Copyright ©1995-2018 by The Writing Lab & The OWL at Purdue and Purdue University. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, reproduced, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed without permission. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our terms and conditions of fair use.

Academic & Employability Skills

Subscribe to academic & employability skills.

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Email Address

Writing your dissertation - structure and sections

Posted in: dissertations

In this post, we look at the structural elements of a typical dissertation. Your department may wish you to include additional sections but the following covers all core elements you will need to work on when designing and developing your final assignment.

The table below illustrates a classic dissertation layout with approximate lengths for each section.

Hopkins, D. and Reid, T., 2018.  The Academic Skills Handbook: Your Guid e to Success in Writing, Thinking and Communicating at University . Sage.

Your title should be clear, succinct and tell the reader exactly what your dissertation is about. If it is too vague or confusing, then it is likely your dissertation will be too vague and confusing. It is important therefore to spend time on this to ensure you get it right, and be ready to adapt to fit any changes of direction in your research or focus.

In the following examples, across a variety of subjects, you can see how the students have clearly identified the focus of their dissertation, and in some cases target a problem that they will address:

An econometric analysis of the demand for road transport within the united Kingdom from  1965 to 2000

To what extent does payment card fraud affect UK bank profitability and bank stakeholders?  Does this justify fraud prevention?

A meta-analysis of implant materials for intervertebral disc replacement and regeneration.

The role of ethnic institutions in social development; the case of Mombasa, Kenya.

Why haven’t biomass crops been adopted more widely as a source of renewable energy in the United Kingdom?

Mapping the criminal mind: Profiling and its limitation.

The Relative Effectiveness of Interferon Therapy for Chronic Hepatitis C

Under what conditions did the European Union exhibit leadership in international climate change negotiations from 1992-1997, 1997-2005 and 2005-Copenhagen respectively?

The first thing your reader will read (after the title) is your abstract. However, you need to write this last. Your abstract is a summary of the whole project, and will include aims and objectives, methods, results and conclusions. You cannot write this until you have completed your write-up.

Introduction

Your introduction should include the same elements found in most academic essay or report assignments, with the possible inclusion of research questions. The aim of the introduction is to set the scene, contextualise your research, introduce your focus topic and research questions, and tell the reader what you will be covering.  It should move from the general  and work towards the specific. You should include the following:

• Attention-grabbing statement (a controversy, a topical issue, a contentious view, a recent problem etc)
• Background and context
• Introduce the topic, key theories, concepts, terms of reference, practices, (advocates and critic)
• Introduce the problem and focus of your research
• Set out your research question(s) (this could be set out in a separate section)
• Your approach to answering your research questions.

Literature review

Your literature review is the section of your report where you show what is already known about the area under investigation and demonstrate the need for your particular study. This is a significant section in your dissertation (30%) and you should allow plenty of time to carry out a thorough exploration of your focus topic and use it to help you identify a specific problem and formulate your research questions.

You should approach the literature review with the critical analysis dial turned up to full volume. This is not simply a description, list, or summary  of everything you have read. Instead, it is a synthesis of your reading, and should include analysis and evaluation of readings, evidence, studies and data, cases, real world applications and views/opinions expressed.  Your supervisor is looking for this detailed critical approach in your literature review, where you unpack sources, identify strengths and weaknesses and find gaps in the research.

In other words, your literature review is your opportunity to show the reader why your paper is important and your research is significant, as it addresses the gap or on-going issue you have uncovered.

You need to tell the reader what was done. This means describing the research methods and explaining your choice. This will include information on the following:

• Are your methods qualitative or quantitative... or both? And if so, why?
• Who (if any) are the participants?
• Are you analysing any documents, systems, organisations? If so what are they and why are you analysing them?
• What did you do first, second, etc?
• What ethical considerations are there?

It is a common style convention to write what was done rather than what you did, and write it so that someone else would be able to replicate your study.

Here you describe what you have found out. You need to identify the most significant patterns in your data, and use tables and figures to support your description. Your tables and figures are a visual representation of your findings, but remember to describe what they show in your writing. There should be no critical analysis in this part (unless you have combined results and discussion sections).

Here you show the significance of your results or findings. You critically analyse what they mean, and what the implications may be. Talk about any limitations to your study, evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of your own research, and make suggestions for further studies to build on your findings. In this section, your supervisor will expect you to dig deep into your findings and critically evaluate what they mean in relation to previous studies, theories, views and opinions.

This is a summary of your project, reminding the reader of the background to your study, your objectives, and showing how you met them. Do not include any new information that you have not discussed before.

This is the list of all the sources you have cited in your dissertation. Ensure you are consistent and follow the conventions for the particular referencing system you are using. (Note: you shouldn't include books you've read but do not appear in your dissertation).

Include any extra information that your reader may like to read. It should not be essential for your reader to read them in order to understand your dissertation. Your appendices should be labelled (e.g. Appendix A, Appendix B, etc). Examples of material for the appendices include detailed data tables (summarised in your results section), the complete version of a document you have used an extract from, etc.

Share this:

• Click to print (Opens in new window)
• Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)

Click here to cancel reply.

• Email * (we won't publish this)

Write a response

I am finding this helpful. Thank You.

It is very useful.

Glad you found it useful Adil!

I was a useful post i would like to thank you

Glad you found it useful! 🙂

Navigating the dissertation process: my tips for final years

Imagine for a moment... After months of hard work and research on a topic you're passionate about, the time has finally come to click the 'Submit' button on your dissertation. You've just completed your longest project to date as part...

8 ways to beat procrastination

Whether you’re writing an assignment or revising for exams, getting started can be hard. Fortunately, there’s lots you can do to turn procrastination into action.

My takeaways on how to write a scientific report

If you’re in your dissertation writing stage or your course includes writing a lot of scientific reports, but you don’t quite know where and how to start, the Skills Centre can help you get started. I recently attended their ‘How...

This page has been archived and is no longer being updated regularly.

Degree In Sight

Discussing your findings

Your dissertation's discussion should tell a story, say experts. What do your data say?

By Beth Azar

"Many students reach this stage of their careers having been focused for several years on the 'trees,'" says Yale University cognitive psychology professor Brian Scholl, PhD. "This section of the dissertation provides an opportunity to revisit the 'forest.'"

Fellow students, your adviser and your dissertation committee members can help provide that outside perspective, adds Yale clinical psychology professor Susan Nolen-Hoeksema, PhD, who teaches a course on writing in psychology.

And while the discussion should put your research into context and tell a story, say experts, it should not overstate your conclusions. How do you find the balance? Follow these do's and don'ts.

DO: Provide context and explain why people should care. DON'T: Simply rehash your results.

Your discussion should begin with a cogent, one-paragraph summary of the study's key findings, but then go beyond that to put the findings into context, says Stephen Hinshaw, PhD, chair of the psychology department at the University of California, Berkeley.

"The point of a discussion, in my view, is to transcend 'just the facts,' and engage in productive speculation," he says.

That means going back to the literature and grappling with what your findings mean, including how they fit in with previous work. If your results differ from others' findings, you should try to explain why, says Nolen-Hoeksema. Then, launch into "bigger picture" issues. For example, a clinical study might discuss how psychologists might apply the findings in a clinical setting or a social psychology project might talk about political implications.

By exploring those kinds of implications, students address what Scholl considers the most important-and often overlooked-purpose of the discussion: to directly explain why others should care about your findings.

"You can't and shouldn't rely on others to intuitively appreciate the beauty and importance of your work," he says.

Sounds simple, right? In fact, choosing what to include can be overwhelming, warns sixth-year Yale University social psychology graduate student Aaron Sackett.

"It is easy to get caught up in the desire to be extremely comprehensive and to bring up every potential issue, flaw, future direction and tangentially related concept," says Sackett. "However, this will make your dissertation seem like it has raised more questions than it answers."

Limit your discussion to a handful of the most important points, as Sackett did on the advice of his adviser.

"No reader wants to wade through ten pages of suppositional reasoning," says Roddy Roediger, PhD, chair of psychology at Washington University.

DO: Emphasize the positive. DON'T: Exaggerate.

One of the biggest errors students make in their discussion is exaggeration, say experts. Speculation is fine as long as you acknowledge that you're speculating and you don't stray too far from your data, say experts. That includes avoiding language that implies causality when your study can only make relational conclusions.

"If your study was not a true experiment, replace verbs that imply causation with words and phrases such as 'correlated with,' 'was associated with' and 'related to,'" write John Cone, PhD, and Sharon Foster, PhD, in a forthcoming revision of "Dissertations and Theses from Start to Finish" (APA, 2006).

Steven David, PhD, who successfully defended his dissertation in clinical geropsychology at the University of Southern California last May, found this point to be particularly difficult. When he defended his master's thesis, his committee told him his conclusions went too far out on a limb. He used more restraint with his dissertation and his committee thought he wasn't positive enough.

"The moral here is to try to find a balance where you set a tone that indeed celebrates interesting findings without too many leaps, while at the same time reporting limitations without being unnecessarily negative," says David.

Indeed, every discussion should include a "humility" section that addresses the study's limitations, write Cone and Foster. But avoid beginning the discussion with a long list of study limitations, says Nolen-Hoeksema.

"This makes me think 'Then why should I care or believe anything you found,' and want to stop reading right there," she says. "Limitations should be noted, but after you've discussed your positive results."

DO: Look toward the future. DON'T: End with it.

Along with noting your work's limitations, it's helpful to also suggest follow-up studies. But don't dwell on the future at the expense of the present,says Scholl.

"I think that too many discussions make the mistake of ending with 'the future,'" he says. "Too often I am left excited not by what was in the dissertation, but by what was not in the dissertation."

Roediger agrees: "Conclude the general discussion with a strong paragraph stating the main point or points again, in somewhat different terms-if possible-than used before."

Remember, adds Scholl, you want readers to remember you and your work. The discussion section is the place to leave your mark. So instead of simply summarizing your data and suggesting a few obvious follow-up studies, think about presenting your data in a novel way, showing how the work might resolve an existing controversy in the literature or explaining how it connects to an entirely different literature.

By the time readers get to your discussion, they're tired, adds Sackett. Give them something clear, concise and interesting to read, and they're sure to appreciate it.

Beth Azar is a writer in Portland, Ore.

10 most common dissertation discussion mistakes

Starting with limitations instead of implications.

Going overboard on limitations, leading readers to wonder why they should read on.

Failing to acknowledge limitations or dismissing them out of hand. 

Making strong claims about weak results.

Failing to differentiate between strong and weak results as you make conclusions about them.

Lapsing into causal language when your data were correlational.

Repeating the introduction.

Restating the results without interpretation or links to other research.

Presenting new results; such data belong in the results section.

Offering no concluding statements or ending with the limitations.

Source: Susan Nolen-Hoeksema, PhD, Yale University

Letters to the Editor

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

Writing your third year psychology dissertation in the UK: A practical guide

Related Papers

Mohd Helmy Hakimie Mohd Rozlan

Md Amir Hossain

Md Ekram Hossain

Nguyen Phuoc Bao An

This is the first comprehensive guide to the range of research methods available to applied psychologists. Ideally suited to students and researchers alike, and covering both quantitative and qualitative techniques, the book takes readers on a journey from research design to final reporting. The book is divided into four sections, with chapters written by leading international researchers working in a range of applied settings: • Getting Started • Data Collection • Data Analysis • Research Dissemination With coverage of sampling and ethical issues, and chapters on everything from experimental and quasi-experimental designs to longitudinal data collection and focus groups, the book provides a concise overview not only of the options available for applied research but also of how to make sense of the data produced. It includes chapters on organisational interventions and the use of digital technologies and concludes with chapters on how to publish your research, whether it's a thesis, journal article or organisational report. This is a must-have book for anyone conducting psychological research in an applied setting. Paula Brough is Professor of Organisational Psychology in the School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Australia. Paula conducts research in organisational psychology with a specific focus on occupational health psychology. Paula's primary research areas include: occupational stress, employee health and well-being, work-life balance and the psychosocial work environment. Paula assesses how work environments can be improved via job redesign, supportive leadership practices and enhanced equity to improve employee health, work commitment and productivity. Paula is an editorial board member of the Journal of Organisational Behavior, Work and Stress and the International Journal of Stress Management.

Abigael Maan Escobar

Before, price and quality completely dominate the buying decision of consumers, but in this era, where consumers are mostly millennials who are more careful and cautious with what they buy, corporate social responsibility (CSR) is now considered as a purchase criterion. This study further examined the role of the five dimensions of CSR (economic, legal, ethical, philanthropic, and environmental) as a predictor of consumer buying behaviour of millennials in the Philippines. The relationship between CSR and consumer buying behaviour was measured in a cross-sectional study design. Both quantitative (online survey) and qualitative (in-depth interview) research methods were adopted by the researcher. For quantitative data, 150 respondents were chosen using non-probability sampling technique. The respondents answered an online questionnaire regarding their knowledge level on CSR, CSR and stakeholders’ expectations in businesses, and CSR and buying behaviour. For the qualitative data, six in-depth interview participants were randomly selected from the Business Administration (BA) students of Southville International School Affiliated with Foreign Universities (SISFU). The researcher used the semi-structured interview guide from Geokhaji’s (2015) study. Through multiple linear regression, significant relationship was found between philanthropic responsibility and consumer buying behaviour, showing that millennials in the Philippines would buy more from companies engaging in philanthropic activities. The qualitative results also showed that millennials consider philanthropic responsibility as the most important CSR dimension. However, huge regard on environmental responsibility was also demonstrated by the in-depth interview participants. Difference in methodology can shine light on this contradicting findings. It is hypothesized that the open-ended questions for in-depth interview, allowed the participants to specifically state their favoured environmental activities that are not given in the online survey. Nonetheless, consistency of quantitative and qualitative results that millennials in the Philippines consider philanthropic responsibility the most was evident.

Some women experience premenstrual syndrome (PMS), and its more severe presentation as premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD), which seriously limits their coping ability in daily life, including their parenting ability. Social workers routinely assess parenting ability, giving rise to the question, “How does the premenstrual knowledge of social workers influence whether and what they ask in their assessment practices with mothers?” The heavily debated premenstrual literature rests on four approaches. After these perspectives, an enhanced biopsychosocial framework (BPS-E) is used to examine the premenstrual knowledge of social workers and their conversations about PMS/PMDD as they assess women’s parenting. This exploratory study used a triangulated convergence design, generating data from both quantitative and qualitative methodologies. In the first phase, 521 social workers completed a Premenstrual Experience Knowledge Questionnaire (PEKQ) created for this research. In the qualitative phase, inspired by an interpretative phenomenological approach, 16 social workers described in interviews their premenstrual knowledge and its impact, if any, on their assessment practices with mothers. Most social workers had limited knowledge of PMS/PMDD, most crucially a) the PMDD DSM-V classification, b) increased suicide attempts during the premenstruum, and c) the effectiveness of SSRI anti-depressants in moderating the symptoms of PMDD. Also, the greater the interference of social workers’ own premenstrual symptoms on their daily living and the more premenstrual training they had received, the higher their premenstrual knowledge scores. Very few social workers in this study (5.1%) addressed premenstrual symptoms with their female clients. However, a statistically significant relationship existed in this sample between asking female clients about PMS/PMDD and social workers’ (a) age, (b) premenstrual knowledge scores, (c) premenstrual training, and (d) the degree to which the premenstrual symptoms of female social workers interfered in their own daily living. These results can direct social work education and practice. Not asking about PMS/PMDD symptoms could have negative outcomes, particularly in child protection, where the safety needs of children could remain unaddressed. Conversely, women who tell uninformed or disapproving social workers about their premenstrual symptoms might be further subjected to mother-blame, stigmatization, or punitive interventions.

Lynn E Barry

Some women experience premenstrual syndrome (PMS), and its more severe presentation as premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD), which seriously limits their coping ability in daily life, including their parenting ability. Social workers routinely assess parenting ability, giving rise to the question, “How does the premenstrual knowledge of social workers influence whether and what they ask in their assessment practices with mothers?” The heavily debated premenstrual literature rests on four approaches. After these perspectives, an enhanced biopsychosocial framework (BPS-E) is used to examine the premenstrual knowledge of social workers and their conversations about PMS/PMDD as they assess women’s parenting. This exploratory study used a triangulated convergence design, generating data from both quantitative and qualitative methodologies. In the first phase, 521 social workers completed a Premenstrual Experience Knowledge Questionnaire (PEKQ) created for this research. In the qualitative phase, inspired by an interpretative phenomenological approach, 16 social workers described in interviews their premenstrual knowledge and its impact, if any, on their assessment practices with mothers. Most social workers had limited knowledge of PMS/PMDD, most crucially a) the PMDD DSM-V classification, b) increased suicide attempts during the premenstruum, and c) the effectiveness of SSRI anti-depressants in moderating the symptoms of PMDD. Also, the greater the interference of social workers’ own premenstrual symptoms on their daily living and the more premenstrual training they had received, the higher their premenstrual knowledge scores. Very few social workers in this study (5.1%) addressed premenstrual symptoms with their female clients. However, a statistically significant relationship existed in this sample between asking female clients about PMS/PMDD and social workers’ (a) age, (b) premenstrual knowledge scores, (c) premenstrual training,and (d) the degree to which the premenstrual symptoms of female social workers interfered in their own daily living. These results can direct social work education and practice. Not asking about PMS/PMDD symptoms could have negative outcomes, particularly in child protection, where the safety needs of children could remain unaddressed. Conversely, women who tell uninformed or disapproving social workers about their premenstrual symptoms might be further subjected to mother-blame, stigmatization, or punitive interventions.

Marco Antonio Perez

research methodology

Musangamfura Vincent

Research Methods: The Basics is an accessible, user-friendly introduction to the different aspects of research theory, methods and practice. Structured in two parts, the first covering the nature of knowledge and the reasons for research, and the second the specific methods used to carry out effective research, this book covers: structuring and planning a research project the ethical issues involved in research different types of data and how they are measured collecting and analysing data in order to draw sound conclusions devising a research proposal and writing up the research. Complete with a glossary of key terms and guides to further reading, this book is an essential text for anyone coming to research for the first time, and is widely relevant across the social sciences and humanities. Nicholas Walliman is Senior Lecturer in the Department of Architecture at Oxford Brookes University, UK.

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

RELATED PAPERS

Lindsy Richardson

Xinxing Jiang

Stephanie Brooks

Jiselle Denise Lim

Yasmin Yusuf

Daniel Woods

Christopher Ryan

ismail samad

dammam aldammam

Tsadiku Setegn

Silvia Cont

Pamela Orozco Márquez

Ashley Grosso

Dr. Fredrick Ssempala (Ph.D.) , James Lam Lagoro

kingsley Daraojimba

Tejaswini Kotian

Nguyễn Hoan

Journal of Medical Ethics

Sara Nora Ross

Sarada Dhakal

Journal for New Generation Sciences

Hermanus Moolman

Wafaa Almotawah

Training and Education in Professional Psychology

Nicholas Ladany

James M. Lashbrooke

Journal of Counseling …

Timothy B. Smith

Dessalegn Fufa

Cyril Jeusset

Kathryn Dekas

Daniel Parker

Transforming Research Methods in the Social Sciences: Case studies from South Africa

Prof Elizabeth (Liz) Archer

Faruk Zulkarnaini

Zain Ul Hussain

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024