family therapy essay examples

• Undergraduate
• High School
• Architecture
• American History
• Asian History
• Antique Literature
• American Literature
• Asian Literature
• Classic English Literature
• World Literature
• Creative Writing
• Linguistics
• Criminal Justice
• Legal Issues
• Anthropology
• Archaeology
• Political Science
• World Affairs
• African-American Studies
• East European Studies
• Latin-American Studies
• Native-American Studies
• West European Studies
• Family and Consumer Science
• Social Issues
• Women and Gender Studies
• Social Work
• Natural Sciences
• Pharmacology
• Earth science
• Agriculture
• Agricultural Studies
• Computer Science
• IT Management
• Mathematics
• Investments
• Engineering and Technology
• Engineering
• Aeronautics
• Medicine and Health
• Alternative Medicine
• Communications and Media
• Advertising
• Communication Strategies
• Public Relations
• Educational Theories
• Teacher's Career
• Chicago/Turabian
• Company Analysis
• Education Theories
• Shakespeare
• Canadian Studies
• Food Safety
• Relation of Global Warming and Extreme Weather Condition
• Movie Review
• Admission Essay
• Annotated Bibliography
• Application Essay
• Article Critique
• Article Review
• Article Writing
• Book Review
• Business Plan
• Business Proposal
• Capstone Project
• Cover Letter
• Creative Essay
• Dissertation
• Dissertation - Abstract
• Dissertation - Conclusion
• Dissertation - Discussion
• Dissertation - Hypothesis
• Dissertation - Introduction
• Dissertation - Literature
• Dissertation - Methodology
• Dissertation - Results
• GCSE Coursework
• Grant Proposal
• Marketing Plan
• Multiple Choice Quiz
• Personal Statement
• Power Point Presentation
• Power Point Presentation With Speaker Notes
• Questionnaire
• Reaction Paper
• Research Paper
• Research Proposal
• SWOT analysis
• Thesis Paper
• Online Quiz
• Literature Review
• Movie Analysis
• Statistics problem
• Math Problem
• All papers examples
• How It Works
• Money Back Policy
• Terms of Use
• Privacy Policy
• We Are Hiring

Family Therapy: A Systemic Integration, Essay Example

Pages: 24

Words: 6645

Hire a Writer for Custom Essay

Use 10% Off Discount: "custom10" in 1 Click 👇

You are free to use it as an inspiration or a source for your own work.

Bowenian therapy offers a very powerful means of helping families to recognize and overcome their destructive and harmful patterns of behavior. It is rooted in systems theory, which itself is the result of a truly massive paradigm shift that overturned the linear, pre-systemic paradigms: instead of straightforward causation, the systems theory approach teaches interdependence of many elements, with all of the elements together creating many causes and effects in very complex ways. This in turn led to Bowen’s insights regarding emotional systems, and how families manage—or fail to manage—them. The goal of Bowenian therapy is to help clients realize how their own lack of differentiation, defined as their ability to separate thoughts from feelings and self from others, is harming them and their loved ones, and how they can change. This powerful therapy promotes a view of the therapist as part of a therapeutic alliance system involving the family; within this framework the clients can map out their processes and began crafting new ones.

An accounting of the pre-systemic world of therapy might truly be said to begin and end with a consideration of causation. The entire mentality that served as the basis for the dominant paradigms in Western psychotherapeutic thought was linear, with events proceeding from causes in an entirely straightforward fashion (Winek, 2009, p. 6). From the time of Freud onward, then, the regnant models held that presenting symptoms of mental illness were caused by some prior events in a wholly straightforward manner. The trouble with this, as later practitioners were to learn, was that human beings do not work in quite so simple and straightforward a manner as, say, billiards. A straightforward consideration of causation and effect, while it amply serves the aims of the physical sciences, is inadequate for a full consideration of the issues which may underlie mental symptoms (pp. 6-7).

The linearity of the pre-systemic views undermined their ability to have any conception of the degree to which the complex interpersonal interchanges of the familial and communal systems could be of significance for the development of mental health issues. Indeed, a key problem of this approach is precisely the fact that it assumes, however implicitly, that the problem with someone who is mentally ill is intrapsychic, resulting from an impairment or difficulty of some kind that is internal to that person (Winek, 2009, p. 6). The reality is far more often a study in interaction, with different causes and effects feeding off of each other to the point where it may become impossible to fully ascertain cycles of causation (pp. 6-7).

Systemic theory is based on a number of concepts which reject entirely the assumptions of the pre-systemic, linear world. Equifinality is a case in point: this is the idea that any given end state may be the result of an infinite, or at least quite considerable, number of pathways. As Winek (2009) explains, a good example is actually depression: “we see that factors such as genetics, family of origin, drug usage, age, socioeconomic status, nutrition, exercise, self-concept, history, head trauma, and lack of social support can all contribute to its development” (p. 7). On the other side of the proverbial coin, there is equipotentiality, the idea that any given situation or state may produce any number of outcomes or final states. The possible ramifications of this may be demonstrated by returning to the example of the individual with depression, whose depression may be the result of any number of factors. By initiating changes in some number of these factors, possibly even all of them, it should be quite possible to enable the individual to overcome their issues with depression and achieve an outcome state that is not characterized by depression (p. 7).

Philosophically, the pre-systemic paradigms adhere to a more modernist approach. In this approach, reality is seen as an objective external reality, one that exists independently of human perception. Reality is ‘out there’, and it may be observed, measured, and made to yield its secrets. This view of reality favors a quantitative methodology for research, since quantitative methodologies are, indeed, suited to measuring and quantifying phenomena. Another ramification of all of this is a focus on the past, with the upbringing in the family of origin seen as influencing present symptoms. However, as recently as the 1940s and 1950s it was considered patently unethical to see multiple family members in a single session, because of multiple transference issues (Winek, 2009, pp. 7-8).

The rise of family therapy is fundamentally associated with the paradigm shift to systems theory, and a radically different way of conceptualizing reality itself. Ironically enough, the origins of the systems theory approach lie with mathematicians, physicists, and engineers—just the sort of specialists one would tend to intuitively think would favor a straightforward, linear approach. In fact, these researchers contributed enormously to the paradigm shift, precisely because they used their expertise to mechanically model the human brain, beginning in the 1940s and 1950s. With this came an insight so powerful and so penetrating that it held the key to a new way of looking at complex systems: in complex systems such as the human brain, the whole truly is more than the sum of its parts. The sum total of all the interrelated parts does not adequately describe the whole, because of emergent properties. With emergent properties, the system assumes a kind of new thing-ness, becoming something that simply did not exist before. a key part of this is that any change to any part of the system will have ripple effects that will affect all parts (Winek, 2009, p. 8).

The groundwork may have been laid by engineers, physicists, and mathematicians, but therapists were quick to appreciate their insights. They realized that if the brain is a complex system after all, perhaps it would only be meet to seek to ascertain how it functions in response to multiple causes and effects, especially those of other brains, other complex systems that cannot be simply reduced to their component parts. From this comes the systemic perspective on the family as a whole consisting of interdependent parts, a whole that can be thought of as an entity in its own right (Goldenberg & Goldenberg, 2013, pp. 91-92; Winek, 2009, p. 8).

Systems theory differs sharply from pre-systemic perspectives in that it is circular rather than linear, and postmodernist and constructivist rather than modernist and positivist. There is no objective external reality from the postmodernist perspective: instead, perception shapes the experience of reality. For a postmodernist, mental health issues do not of necessity reflect some deficiency or trauma in the person’s upbringing. In fact, they may not even indicate conflict at all. From the constructivist standpoint, which is a part of this broader platform of systems theory, perceptions of reality and beliefs about self and others are constructed, and are then used to guide behavior and affect. Individual family members, and the family as a whole, return to these constructions again and again to guide their behavior as they seek to go forward (Goldenberg & Goldenberg, 2013, p. 23).

This, of course, changes the landscape for therapy profoundly: instead of ferreting out putative past trauma or deficiencies in the upbringing, the therapist can engage with the family and seek to ascertain how they communicate, as well as what they tell themselves and each other with the narratives that they have constructed. This too raises an important point, another distinction with the older, pre-systemic approaches: the systemic approach holds that one cannot observe a system outside of it, since to observe and try to change a system is to participate in it. This is second-order cybernetics, contrasting with the first-order cybernetics of the pre-systemic approach: the idea that there is the family system on the one hand, and the client-therapist system on the other (Goldenberg & Goldenberg, 2013, pp. 23-24).

There were a number of important figures responsible for this transition. Beginning in the early 1940s, many of them met in a series of conferences, the Macy Conferences, and produced the important conceptions of both general systems theory and cybernetic systems theory. These theories describe the functioning of complex systems, with all of their constituent parts working together interactively to produce emergent properties in the whole (Gehart, 2014, p. 38).

Anthropologist Gregory Bateson was one of the more important figures who participated in these conferences. He used his studies of inter-tribal interactions in New Guinea and in Bali to articulate cybernetic systems theory, an important model of how complex systems function (Gehart, 2014, p. 38). Bateson’s contributions included insights into human behavior in terms of social systems, rather than intrapsychic functions. He also produced a theory of schizophrenia based on his own extensive, ten-year-long study of how families with schizophrenic family members communicated. His double-bind theory of schizophrenia “reconceptualized psychotic behavior as an attempt to meaningfully respond in a family system characterized by double-bind communications” (p. 38).

Milton Erickson was another significant figure. Known for his unconventional and dramatically successful therapies, Erickson used hypnotherapy and paradoxical directives to bypass client resistance and motivate them to utilize their strengths in such a way as to overcome their problems (Haley, 1993, pp. 18-19; Kottler & Montgomery, 2011, p. 254). Erickson contributed tremendously to systems theory, with his “brief, rapid, and creative interventions” (Gehart, 2014, p. 38).

For systems theory, families are entities governed by rules. These rules shape behavior, effectively determining who is allowed to do what, who is expected to do what, and so forth. Rules, for families, are guides to behavior. Often unspoken, family rules might determine any number of important behaviors that help the family to regulate itself. Values and roles are established through rules, which helps to determine much regarding who does what in a household. With some couples, one partner may be the more pragmatic, straightforward partner, while the other is the more feeling, supportive partner. With other couples, both partners may have elements of each (Goldenberg & Goldenberg, 2013, pp. 91-93).

For the therapist, understanding a family’s rules can provide a roadmap of sorts to understanding the family. If the therapist can ascertain how the family is used to acting and why, they will be that much more well prepared to help them correct behavior patterns that are not productive. An important idea here, amply born out in practice, is that out of a spectrum encompassing all possible behavior, families will usually determine some preferred range that encompasses how they will interact with each other. Following Jackson (1965) this usually follows a kind of redundancy principle, which builds a great deal of repetition into the family system (ctd. in Goldenberg & Goldenberg, 2013, p. 93). Understand the rules, begin to understand the family.

There are arguably two different types of rules, which can be characterized with particular metaphors. Descriptive rules, characterized by descriptive metaphors, describe patterns of interchange. In essence, descriptive rules describe what actually happens, or will happen. In different families, different descriptive rules may or may not be negotiable. In general, “rigid families may have too many rules, chaotic families too few” (Goldenberg & Goldenberg, 2013, pp. 93-94). Prescriptive rules, on the other hand, are based on prescriptive metaphors. For example: “’Children allow parents to speak without interruption’; ‘Children hang up their clothes’… ‘Mother makes decisions regarding the purchase of new clothes’” (p. 94). Other examples may include gender roles, governing a gendered division of labor (or a relative lack thereof), and other cultural and/or religious values (p. 94).

The aforementioned are the kinds of rules that are usually quite openly stated and explicit: they are usually very clear. However, it is quite common for families to have rules that are not explicitly stated. Children often know which of their parents to approach in order to get the best response to a problem or a dispute in any given situation—or indeed if they should approach their parents at all. Some families are warm and nurturing, others are conflict-prone and fractious. With these characteristics, systems theory argues, come rules, many of which will remain unstated and not at all explicit (Goldenberg & Goldenberg, 2013, p. 94).

Fundamentally, rules function to provide families with a means of self-correction in order to maintain a self-regulating, balanced state of homeostasis. Without rules, there would be nothing to correct with or to, since there would be no clear idea of what to do to improve things, and/or what improving things would look like. Indeed, this is precisely the problem with chaotic, disordered families: they are not well equipped to correct their problems because they do not have enough rules that are sufficiently enforced. Here, however, a vital point is that maintaining homeostasis is not about maintaining a static state, but rather a balanced, dynamic state. And in order to maintain balance in a dynamic system, feedback is necessary (Gehart, 2014, p. 39).

There are two kinds of feedback which a system can provide: positive feedback and negative feedback. These terms require some definition. In essence, negative feedback means that no new information is coming in. Things are the same: there is no change detectable. Positive feedback, on the other hand, means that something is changing. Such a change could be a beneficial thing or a detrimental thing, and either kind of positive feedback can create reactions that will produce one of two outcomes: “(a) return to former homeostasis, or (b) create a new homeostasis” (Gehart, 2014, p. 40). The changes produced may also be of two kinds: second-order, and first-order. With second-order change, a new normal is produced. The system acquires a new homeostasis, a new baseline from which to measure future change. First-order change, on the other hand, occurs when the system self-corrects in order to return to the homeostasis it had before (p. 40).

Families also have subsystems. These subsystems are of the most foundational importance if the rules of a family system are to be understood. First, there is the parental subsystem, which consists of parents and may, depending on family and culture, also consist of grandparents, older siblings tasked with some responsibilities for younger siblings, and the like. This subsystem provides a kind of governing organ in the family system, responsible for raising children and (hopefully) instilling discipline. When this subsystem functions well, children learn healthy ways of dealing with those in authority over them, while also finding their own abilities for decision making. When this subsystem functions poorly and breaks down, as can be seen in cases of rebellion, defiance, and other problematic behaviors, there are often deep-rooted issues involved (Goldenberg & Goldenberg, 2013, p. 101).

A second main subsystem is that of the siblings, for those who have them. As Goldenberg and Goldenberg (2013) explain, sibling relationships are of profound importance for developing interpersonal skills, helping children to learn how to deal with other people (p. 101). Siblings are also very often a source of profound and lifelong connections. Overall, this subsystem tends to be highly dependent on the family system’s other subsystems: if those function well, it will too; if not, then very probably not (p. 101). There are other subsystems in families as well, such as mother-daughter, father-son, mother-youngest child, and the like, but they are usually less important than the ones described (p. 101).

Individuals, subsystems, and systems are separated from each other and from the outside by boundaries. Behavioral boundaries, based on rules, determine the scope for autonomy of the individual, and often what they are expected to contribute to a subsystem or system as well. Subsystems within a family system also have boundaries, and families have boundaries with the outside world. In some cases, the boundaries serve as gatekeepers: there might be a rule, for example, that family problems—possibly including quite severe ones—are not to be discussed with those who are not family members. They may also reify important values, such as punctuality, respect for others, or particular religious and/or cultural practices (Goldenberg & Goldenberg, 2013, p. 101).

A healthy, well-functioning boundary is strong enough to differentiate the individuals, subsystems, or systems it defines, but also open enough to permit sufficient interchange. A common family example: a parent may reinforce the boundary between the parental subsystem and the sibling subsystem by telling the oldest child that they are not allowed to dictate to their siblings; however, the parent may suspend this rule on certain occasions, entrusting the oldest sibling with a limited authority to watch their younger siblings while the parents go out for the evening (Goldenberg & Goldenberg, 2013, pp. 101-102). Good boundaries are well-defined, clearly specifying who is and is not within the category in question and what their responsibilities are, but they are also permeable, facilitating exchange with the outside (p. 102).

This, then, constitutes the background to Bowenian intergenerational therapy. Bowenian intergenerational therapy draws heavily from the background of systems theory, conceptualizing individuals and the relationships that define their family systems. A key concept in Bowenian therapy is differentiation, a term used to describe the ability of the individual to distinguish between intrapersonal and interpersonal distress (Gehart, 2014, p. 230). With intrapersonal differentation, the seminal objective of successful differentiation is the separation of thoughts from feelings. By so doing, the individual is better able to respond to circumstances that may confront them: rather than merely reacting, they are able to respond in a cogent manner, thinking rather than merely feeling. Interpersonal differentiation covers the ability to distinguish between self and others, a valuable skill in interacting with others socially (p. 230).

For Bowen, differentiation consisted of the ability of the individual to strike a balance between their needs for togetherness on the one hand, and autonomy on the other (Gehart, 2014, p. 230). The more differentiated the person, the more capable they are of separating thoughts from feelings and self from others. This means that more differentiated people are more capable of handling life’s challenges, including the challenges of living in a family, or being in an intimate relationship (p. 230). More differentiated people are better capable of exercising their own faculties for thinking, planning, and carrying out their designs. This is especially marked where issues that may provoke anxiety, fear, or other insecurities are involved: the more differentiated person will be at an advantage, because of their ability to distinguish feelings from thoughts and self from others (Goldenberg & Goldenberg, p. 208).

Another distinction Bowen drew is between the pseudo-self and the solid-self. Someone who has achieved a solid self, the desirable state in Bowen’s thought, “operates on the basis of clearly defined beliefs, opinions, convictions, and life principles developed through the process of intellectual reasoning and the consideration of alternatives” (Becvar & Becvar, 2013, p. 146). On the other hand, those individuals with a highly fused state often exhibit a pseudo-self, making choices “on the basis of emotional pressures rather than on the basis of reasoned principles” (p. 146). These people are not very self-aware, and as such are not aware of the fact that they are frequently inconsistent (p. 146).

Bowen believed that the great test of the differentiation experience was the ability of the individual to differentiate themselves from their parents. The test, then, is for the individual to be able to successfully differentiate, negotiating the bonds that they have with their parents and establishing their own identity. To be sure, however, the expression of this varies by culture: not all cultures process this in the same manner. A key point is that this is also not about detachment, only differentiation: a well-differentiated person may still have very deep, strong feelings about any subject, but they are not ruled by those feelings. They understand their feelings, and can distinguish them from their thoughts. This helps them to be more rational about what they think and feel (Goldenberg & Goldenberg, 2013, p. 209).

The opposite of differentiation is fusion. Bowen believed, and the current wisdom remains, that individuals who are poorly differentiated tend to be poorly differentiated, or highly fused, both with respect to self and others and with respect to thoughts and feelings. These individuals react adversely to even very low levels of stress, because they are unable to process their circumstances very capably. Such individuals are frequently ruled by their reactions, by whatever strong emotion may seize them—or others, since they are also poorly differentiated from their families (Goldenberg & Goldenberg, 2013, p. 209). Such individuals are often vulnerable to exercising too little responsibility for themselves, and/or exercising too much for others. One ramification of all this is that the poorly-differentiated, highly fused person consumes their energy in frustration, anxiety, and other emotional experiences, as well as in their entangled relationships. This leaves them with little in the way of energy to self-direct, meaning they are not terribly capable of contributing to a healthy, balanced homeostatic state in their marriage and/or family. In fact, their dysfunctional behavior is frequently an integral part of the regular state (Klever, 1998, p. 121).

These ideas in turn are solidly connected to Bowen’s intergenerational hypothesis. Bowen believed that people exercise assortative mating preferences with regard to their level of differentiation. He believed that people were attracted to those with similar levels of differentiation. Thus, poorly differentiated people tend to find each other, get married, and start families. The same is true for well-differentiated people, of course, but they are much less likely to need the help of a therapist. Because poorly differentiated people tend to start families that replicate the patterns they grew up with, those problems are in turn quite frequently passed down to the next generation (Becvar & Becvar, 2013, p. 146).

The logical outcome of the pairing of two undifferentiated people is that both individuals will end up in a kind of reflective, mutually-reinforcing spiral: undifferentiated, they will both look to the other for a sense of belonging, stability, and surety. The problem is that since they are both in need of this and unable to provide it, they end up caught in a spiral of instability and relationship turmoil: each party is looking to the other, but neither is able to give the other party what they need (Becvar & Becvar, 2013, p. 146). One consequence of this is emotional reactivity, a volatile mixture of clashing emotions that produces distance between the spouses. Since each cannot get stability from the other, the relationship stalls—or is prone to profound conflict. In either case, distance is the result, isolation bred of the inability to find meaningful fulfillment in the relationship. Dysfunction of one kind or another is another outcome that is very common, as the parties are unable to resolve their differences and aid each other properly. Outright conflict is still another result, as the differences breed resentment and anger, leading to fighting. Projection of the problem is another outcome that is also very common with this pattern of instability, as both partners are unable to resolve it properly for themselves (p. 146).

It is this last deleterious outcome, projection of the problem onto one or more of the children in the family, that is the beginning of triangulation. Bowen believed that dyads, two-person systems, were prone to much more stability as long as they were calm. After all, two people can form a pattern of mutually-reinforcing behavior which, even if dysfunctional in many ways, is nonetheless relatively stable. At any rate, it is much easier to achieve and maintain this outcome with two people than it is with three people, a triangle or triad. It is not only that the threshold for destabilization is much lower with three people; rather, a dyad that becomes too stressed may result in one or even both parties seeking the aid of a third party, usually a vulnerable third party, to bolster their position. This logic, of course, extends to both parties, so a single triad can very easily lead to an escalating cascade of interlocking triangles, triangles feeding upon triangles to greatly compound the problem (Becvar & Becvar, 2013, p. 146).

The result: a process of family projection, by which the parents project their lack of differentiation and all the problems attendant upon it onto their children. The typical pathway involves anxiety, the result of the emotional fusion. The parents then communicate their anxiety to the child, thereby involving the child in their own efforts to gain stability and assurance. Bowen believed that much the most common form of triangulation was “one in which the child resonates the mother’s instability and lack of confidence in herself as mother, which the mother interprets as a problem in the child” (Becvar & Becvar, 2013, p. 147). The result: overprotection and increased attention on the part of the mother towards the child. This in turn decreases the child’s functionality, as they in effect learn to be passive, learn to be helpless. Then comes the role of the father: he will try to “calm the mother and play a supportive role in dealing with the child” (p. 147). The result of this profoundly unhealthy pattern, however, is a new kind of stability: both mother and father are being attentive to the child’s problems, even if they are doing so in a way that is teaching the child passivity and helplessness. The result is that the couple has now oriented themselves around the child’s problems. The child’s problems dominate the couple’s lives, and thus the family life. It is unhealthy and dysfunctional, but it is stable, and it is a thoroughly rule-governed system (p. 147).

Bowen believed that there were different pathways by which the third person in a triangle becomes involved in that triangle. In some cases, the dyad may actively recruit them, quite possibly unwillingly: for example, a mother-daughter dyad might recruit the father to help resolve a pattern of disputation; vice-versa for a father-son dyad and the mother. It is also possible, Bowen believed, for the highly charged emotions of the dyad to “overflow”, in which case they, in effect, spill over onto the third person and involve them that way. Children may often feel like this when their parents are fighting, and especially during a divorce. Finally, the third person may have a predisposition due to emotional programming to become involved, whether because that is just how the family does things generally, or because of some specific rule or circumstance (Goldenberg & Goldenberg, 2013, p. 212).

From all of this it follows that intergenerational processes are indeed of paramount importance—as Bowen believed. Following Bowenian therapy, one powerful assessment tool for helping couples and families is the genogram. This is essentially a kind of history of family events, one that maps out the processes that characterize the family and the etiologies thereof. By so doing, the therapist can help the family to see how they are being dysfunctional, why—this is always an important part of Bowenian therapy, the why—and, crucially, possibilities for change. The genogram is much, much more than an assessment tool: as Gehart (2014) explains, it is also a very powerful means of intervention (p. 231). The assessment part of the genogram is the way in which it maps out important intergenerational patterns. A genogram can include parenting styles and personalities: for example, an authoritarian father with an anger problem has a daughter who grows up to replicate many of these same patterns in her family. Perhaps her husband comes from a family where no one ever raised their voice or even talked about their feelings much, and so the two have many problems in their marriage.

In this case, the genogram would help them to see all of this more clearly, simply by putting it down and making it legible. If done well, a genogram is a very real consciousness-raising exercise, one that can help people to appreciate things that they might never have even considered before. This in turn can serve as the touchstone for very real and very powerful interventions. The interventions typically take the form of helping people to realize how they can do things differently, by breaking the cycles of ineffective, harmful, and dysfunctional behavior. By so doing, the couple/family can begin to repair the damage. Very often, the ‘intervention’ will follow quite naturally from the process of mapping out the genogram, as the clients realize that they are simply replicating harmful patterns of behavior, and determine to affect a change for the better (Gehart, 2014, p. 231; Goldenberg & Goldenberg, 2013).

From all of this a great deal follows about the role of the therapist, how change occurs, and what ‘health’ looks like. For one thing, the therapist has to be able to lead by example. ‘Health’ means differentiation: this much has already been established. Therefore, the goal of therapy is to help the clients to become differentiated. Only the differentiated therapist can help a client: it is scarcely conceivable that a poorly-differentiated therapist could be of much help to a client. One very important reason for this is that only a differentiated person, in this line of theory, is capable of maintaining a presence that is relatively free from anxiety. This is because, again, differentiation between emotions and thoughts is required if one is to be able to master one’s emotions and not be ruled by them. If one is not differentiated, then the first time that something goes wrong or someone expresses anxiety—again, differentiation includes differentiation of self and others—then the therapist is likely to become anxious as well. For this reason, the therapist must be a paragon of the thing that they are trying to teach the client(s) if they are to progress at all (Gehart, 2014, p. 232).

What, then, does Bowenian therapy actually consist of? What does it look like? The answer is that it consists of a great deal of observation and discussion. There are no special tricks, as it were: what matters is the process. What Bowen aimed to do was to help his clients create a roadmap for change—and to do that, they had to see where they had been. The means of therapy, then, entail the therapist sitting down with the clients and going over the processes of the family: what has happened, and with whom, and how, and why. Only by so doing can the therapist help the clients to see what has gone wrong, where, with whom, how, why, and how they might be able to rectify the deleterious patterns of behavior with better and more effective patterns of behavior. A key emphasis of this methodology is focusing on emotional systems, emotional processes: only by so doing, Bowen believed, could the therapist help their clients to facilitate a changed situation, a better family life, one characterized by support and building up of each other rather than whatever dysfunctional and harmful behavior they may be manifesting (Becvar & Becvar, 2013, pp. 149-150).

Bowenian therapy is systems therapy, based on systems theory. Unlike other schools that focus on specific itemized elements, say, Bowenian therapy looks at how the systems in question work. This is what the therapist must observe, and in observing must communicate to their clients. Only by so doing can the clients have a real shot at change—at effectively overturning the problematic patterns of behavior and substituting good, beneficial patterns of behavior. This is why Bowenian therapy is not reducible to a great deal of specific techniques: it is about the process, and as such is concerned to a great degree with the journey, as it were, as well as the destination. Still, there are specific things that the therapist can and should do, and others they should avoid (Becvar & Becvar, 2013, pp. 149-150).

In the actual therapy itself, then, the first key thing for the therapist to be able to help the clients ascertain is the emotional systems of the family. Once the family has identified these, the whole process will become the more simple. The emotional systems of the family are those processes that affect the regulation of the whole such that they determine the family’s means of processing affect. From this it follows that if there is a dysfunction in any part of the system, the problem will lie within one or more of the family’s emotional systems. Emotional systems may include any number of processes for solving problems, and as such may channel anger, fear, and other negative emotions as well as love, reassurance and support. What characterizes all such systems is their interdependence, such that all elements are tied together and affect each other. Resources used to counter or ameliorate the effects of one parent’s drinking problem, say, or anger problem cannot be used to provide support to other members for other things—or to counter or ameliorate their dysfunctions (Gehart, 2014, p. 233; Becvar & Becvar, 2013; Goldenberg & Goldenberg, 2013).

Bowen believed that chronic anxiety was present in all natural systems. Chronic anxiety, he held, was a natural response to traumatic events—to crises, to conflict, to loss, to other difficulties of a serious nature. Chronic anxiety is natural, but it is not necessarily good or healthy or beneficial in any way. Bowen believed that he could reduce chronic anxiety in a family by helping them to facilitate their own differentiation. Again, since differentiation enables one to effectively rule one’s emotions and not be ruled by them, then it follows that a family of well-differentiated individuals would be more capable of overcoming chronic anxiety and seeing things with clearer heads, which should in turn help them to overcome the problems at hand and produce a situation where chronic anxiety is not likely to arise (Gehart, 2014, p. 233).

The therapist can then help the clients to see how their emotional systems flow through multigenerational patterns of transmission, as parents, say, project their anxiety onto their children, or model dysfunctional and harmful patterns of behavior involving substance abuse, anger, and the like. This can also help clients to see whether they are replicating Patterns X, Y, and Z, or rebelling against them—after all, children often diverge from their parents on at least some issues, and sometimes they outright rebel against parental policies. A conservative, conventional family may produce a wildly unconventional son or daughter; a weak, indecisive, or even absent parent may produce a son or daughter who becomes strong, capable, resourceful, and caring of others because they had to be so growing up. This exercise can help clients to see both what works and what doesn’t: thus, it is not necessarily an unending litany of dysfunctions and pathologies, but rather an examination of what has been going on in the family, why, and whether or not this part or that part is working (Becvar & Becvar, 2013, pp. 144-149; Gehart, 2014, p. 233).

This exercise is, to be sure, a very powerful one. It can also help clients to figure out their level of differentiation, and how this has been passed down (or not) through the generations. If the clients can see this, then they will be able to figure out where they need to improve in terms of differentiating emotions and thoughts, and between individuals. All of this can in turn enable clients to see emotional triangles, how unstable dyads—say, mother and father—involve third parties, such as one or more of the children, and how this produces a cascade of instability that compounds misery of all kinds. Indeed, triangles are especially important to identify. So too is the family projection process, since this is how the anxieties and dysfunctions of the parents’ relationship are transmitted to the children. Conversely, an especially important process for the therapist to help clients assess is emotional cutoff: the situations in which Person A no longer engages with Person B emotionally. Cutoff is especially important to root out because it can be so pernicious: people who display cutoff usually believe that they are healthy for doing so, because it is a means of actually regulating their emotions and how they interact with others. In fact, cutoff is typically a sign of problems with differentiation: fusion has gotten to the point where Person A must not interact with Person B if they want to be comfortable at all. Basically it is an attempt to rectify a bad case of fusion, but it relies on avoiding the problem by avoiding the person—not a healthy pattern in the least (Gehart, 2014, pp. 234-236; Becvar & Becvar, 2013, pp. 146-150).

What, then, is the central conception of health in Bowen’s model? In fact, Bowen’s model does away with normalcy as such: it is about levels of functioning, and it recognizes that there is a spectrum. A healthy family may still have certain patterns that are not optimal, and it is neither realistic nor at all reasonable to expect even a very healthy family to be able to deal with all situations it may face. Different individuals have different strengths; ipso facto, one healthy family that may be very good at dealing with some crises may be very poor at dealing with others, especially if they are well outside of its pool of experience (Becvar & Becvar, 2013, pp. 147-148).

All of this said, to state the obvious Bowenian theory has very decided ideas about health and pathology. The differentiated individual and the differentiated family are healthy; the undifferentiated, fused individual/couple/family are not. There is a continuum, and many different people and families can be found at very different points on the continuum, but there is still a very clear direction in that differentiation creates a more healthy situation, and fusion creates a less healthy situation. Correcting pathology and promoting health, then, means helping clients to see how they are not differentiated, and the specific patterns of problematic and hurtful behavior they are replicating, and to use these insights in a meaningful, productive way to craft new patterns of communication and behavior (Becvar & Becvar, 2013, pp. 148-150).

With this comes some very important assumptions about what is a healthy, differentiated individual. A healthy, differentiated individual is inner-directed rather than outer-directed: she looks to herself for meaning, focus, purpose, and the ability to set her own goals. She believes in taking responsibility for herself, and lives her life accordingly. She relates to others from a position of strength rather than ‘weakness’ or need. She separates thinking from feeling. To put it mildly, these are quite particular assumptions, and not everyone may share them—indeed, there may be good reason not to, depending the point of view one may hold to. Nonetheless, the model remains a highly useful one (Becvar & Becvar, 2013, p. 149).

Systems theory constitutes one of the truly great paradigm shifts in the history of thought. It overturned modernist, positivist epistemology and realist ontogeny for constructivist, postmodern ontogenies and epistemologies. In so doing, it laid the foundations of Bowenian therapy. Rather than a simple cause and effect joining putative childhood traumas to present dysfunctions, Bowenian therapy joins multiple elements of a family system together, and looks at many different levels of interlocking causation and triangulation. Bowenian therapy also focuses on differentiation, the ways in which people do or do not separate emotions from thoughts and self from others. In so doing, Bowenian therapy offers clients a very powerful means of figuring out exactly what it is that they are doing that is not working, and how to fix it. By so doing, Bowenian therapy teaches clients to use their own strengths to, in effect, heal themselves and their loved ones.

Becvar, D. S., & Becvar, R. J. (2013). Family therapy: A systemic integration (8 th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

Gehart, D. (2014). Mastering competencies in family therapy: A practical approach to theory and clinical case documentation (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.

Goldenberg, I., & Goldenberg, H. (2013). Family therapy: an overview (8 th ed.). Belmont, CA: Brooke/Cole Cengage Learning.

Klever, P. (1998). Marital fusion and differentiation. In P. Titelman (Ed.), Clinical applications of Bowen Family Systems Theory (pp. 119-146). Binghamton, NY: The Haworth Press.

Kottler, J. A., & Montgomery, M. J. (2011). Theories of counseling and therapy: An experiential approach (2 nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Winek, J. L. (2009). Systemic family therapy: From theory to practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Stuck with your Essay?

Get in touch with one of our experts for instant help!

Model and Application, Outline Example

Reframing & Positive Connotation, Essay Example

Time is precious

don’t waste it!

Plagiarism-free guarantee

Privacy guarantee

Secure checkout

Money back guarantee

Related Essay Samples & Examples

Relatives, essay example.

Pages: 1

Words: 364

Voting as a Civic Responsibility, Essay Example

Words: 287

Utilitarianism and Its Applications, Essay Example

Words: 356

The Age-Related Changes of the Older Person, Essay Example

Pages: 2

Words: 448

The Problems ESOL Teachers Face, Essay Example

Pages: 8

Words: 2293

Should English Be the Primary Language? Essay Example

Pages: 4

Words: 999

Presentations made painless

• Get Premium

125 Family Therapy Essay Topic Ideas & Examples

Inside This Article

Family therapy is a crucial aspect of mental health treatment that focuses on improving communication and relationships within families. It can be used to address a wide range of issues, from conflict resolution to coping with major life changes. If you're studying family therapy or looking for essay topic ideas, here are 125 suggestions to get you started:

• The impact of divorce on children and how family therapy can help.
• Strategies for improving communication within blended families.
• The role of cultural differences in family therapy.
• How to address substance abuse within a family through therapy.
• The benefits of family therapy for individuals with eating disorders.
• Using family therapy to support a child with ADHD.
• The impact of trauma on family dynamics and the role of therapy in healing.
• Strategies for addressing sibling rivalry in family therapy.
• The benefits of family therapy for families dealing with chronic illness.
• The role of technology in family therapy sessions.
• How family therapy can help improve parent-child relationships.
• The impact of domestic violence on families and the role of therapy in recovery.
• Strategies for addressing financial stress within families through therapy.
• The benefits of family therapy for LGBTQ+ families.
• Using family therapy to support families with a member in the military.
• The role of attachment theory in family therapy.
• Strategies for addressing grief and loss within families through therapy.
• The impact of mental illness on family dynamics and the role of therapy in treatment.
• Using family therapy to address generational trauma.
• The benefits of family therapy for families with a member with a disability.
• Strategies for addressing infidelity within families through therapy.
• The role of forgiveness in family therapy.
• How family therapy can help families navigate divorce and co-parenting.
• The impact of social media on family dynamics and the role of therapy in addressing it.
• Using family therapy to address communication barriers within immigrant families.
• The benefits of family therapy for families with a history of addiction.
• Strategies for addressing intergenerational conflict within families through therapy.
• The role of spirituality in family therapy.
• How family therapy can help families with a history of abuse.
• The impact of parenting styles on family dynamics and the role of therapy in addressing them.
• Using family therapy to support families with a member in prison.
• The benefits of family therapy for families with a history of trauma.
• Strategies for addressing perfectionism within families through therapy.
• The role of self-care in family therapy.
• How family therapy can help families navigate major life transitions.
• The impact of technology addiction on family dynamics and the role of therapy in addressing it.
• Using family therapy to support families with a member in recovery from addiction.
• The benefits of family therapy for families with a history of mental illness.
• Strategies for addressing codependency within families through therapy.
• The role of boundary-setting in family therapy.
• How family therapy can help families navigate relocation.
• The impact of social isolation on family dynamics and the role of therapy in addressing it.
• Using family therapy to support families with a member with a chronic illness.
• The benefits of family therapy for families with a history of domestic violence.
• Strategies for addressing enmeshment within families through therapy.
• The role of empathy in family therapy.
• How family therapy can help families navigate adolescence.
• The impact of financial stress on family dynamics and the role of therapy in addressing it.
• Using family therapy to support families with a member in the foster care system.
• The benefits of family therapy for families with a history of attachment issues.
• Strategies for addressing emotional neglect within families through therapy.
• The role of mindfulness in family therapy.
• How family therapy can help families navigate empty nest syndrome.
• The impact of social comparison on family dynamics and the role of therapy in addressing it.
• Using family therapy to support families with a member in recovery from trauma.
• The benefits of family therapy for families with a history of communication barriers.
• Strategies for addressing boundary issues within families through therapy.
• The role of self-esteem in family therapy.
• How family therapy can help families navigate aging parents.
• The impact of technology use on family dynamics and the role of therapy in addressing it.
• The benefits of family therapy for families with a history of substance abuse.
• Strategies for addressing attachment issues within families through therapy.
• Using family therapy to support families with a member in the foster care system. 68

Want to research companies faster?

Instantly access industry insights

Let PitchGrade do this for me

Leverage powerful AI research capabilities

We will create your text and designs for you. Sit back and relax while we do the work.

Explore More Content

• Privacy Policy
• Terms of Service

© 2024 Pitchgrade

Home — Essay Samples — Psychology — Clinical Psychology — Family Therapy

Essays on Family Therapy

Family counseling case study: structural family therapy, meaning, purpose and influence of family therapy, made-to-order essay as fast as you need it.

Each essay is customized to cater to your unique preferences

+ experts online

Deep Comparative Analysis of Emotional Focused Couple Therapy Theory and Structural Family Therapy Theory

Strong points and advantages of family therapy, analysis of a worn path short story, running head: popular media reflection paper, let us write you an essay from scratch.

• 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
• Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours

Genogram and Other Tools to Use in The Family Art Therapy

Genogram analysis: exploring family trends, the role of family therapy in healing, family counseling: strengthening bonds, get a personalized essay in under 3 hours.

Expert-written essays crafted with your exact needs in mind

Family Conflict and Effective Communication

Exploring family therapy case studies, family genogram: a tool for understanding family dynamics, relevant topics.

• Interventions
• Psychotherapy
• Psychopaths
• Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
• Art Therapy
• Psychoanalysis
• Procrastination

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

No need to pay just yet!

We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .

• Instructions Followed To The Letter
• Deadlines Met At Every Stage
• Unique And Plagiarism Free

Bowen family system theory Expository Essay

Introduction, bowens 8 concepts.

The pioneers of family therapy long identified the social and cultural factors that shape our perception regarding ourselves and our immediate relations, our notion of what is regarded “normal” and “healthy”, and our prospects about how the world works. However, Bowen was the first person to recognize that our family’s history significantly shapes the values, perceptions, and experiences of each generation, along with how that generation passes down these things to later generations.

Bowen’s theory centers on the balance of two forces: togetherness and individuality. He points that too much togetherness creates fusion and curbs individuality, or developing a sense of ego. The theory posits that it natural for members of a family unit are closely linked emotionally.

Relations in a family deeply affect each member’s thoughts, feelings, and actions in such a way that it always appears as if these persons are living under the same “emotional skin” (Hare-Mustin, 1978, pp. 190). The members seek each others’ approval, care, and support and respond to each other’s needs, anticipations, and suffering.

The togetherness and reactivity makes the working of the family members interdependent, hence an alteration in one member’s working is followed by a corresponding alteration in the working of the other members. Although different families vary in the level of togetherness, it is always present to some level (McGoldrick, Pearce, and Giordano, 1982, pp. 73).

Bowen’s theory also focuses on systems that develop in families so as to diffuse tension and anxiety. A key source of anxiety in families is the thought of either too much closeness or too much distant between them. The level of anxiety in any one family unit will be governed by the current levels of outer pressure and subtle to specific subjects that have been passed over from the previous groups. Bowen’s theory aims to reduce chronic tension by aiding in the awareness of how emotions function (Goodnow & Lim, 1997, pp. 35).

The Bowenian theory is made up of eight interlocking conceptions that explain family development and workings. The 8 th concept tries to link his theory to social developments, and therefore has limited applicability to the use of his therapy (1991, pp. 25).

Differentiation of Self

Differentiation of self is regarded as the most important concept among all eight, and is defined as the ability to detach feelings and thoughts. Some texts define this concept as a person’s ability to separate his/her intellectual and emotional functioning from that of the family.

When differentiation of thoughts and feelings does not occur, a person becomes flooded with feelings and cannot think logically when they are required to do so. In addition, they find it difficult to separate their own feelings from others as their families significantly shape how they think about situations, feel about people, and interpret their experiences.

Differentiation is the process of freeing oneself from family. This implies being able to have differing opinions from your family members while still ensuring an emotional connection with them. It also implies being able to soberly reflect on a conflicted situation, realizing one’s role in it, and finally choosing a different reaction should a similar or related scenario occur in the future.

In family systems, whenever there is an altercation between any two members, one or both parties will enlist the help of a third person, hence forming a triangle (James, 1989, pp. 179). Basically, a triangle consists of the two family members in disagreement and a third entity brought in to diffuse the situation or to gang up against the other member in case of chronic anxiety. The two family members originally involved in the conflict are initially regarded as insiders (James, 1989, pp. 180).

The insiders may exclude the participation of a 3 rd member when tensions are low between them, however, this may cause the third party to feel distant and he/she may strive to get closer to one of the insiders (Quadrio, 1986. pp. 185).

Consequently, the most uncomfortable insider will move closer to an outsider leading to exclusion of the other insider, who then becomes an outsider while the original outsider becomes an insider. In an event of a severe disagreement or tension, one insider takes an outside position while the outsider takes his/her position to fight with the other insider and once calm has been restored, the outsider will attempt to regain his initial position.

Nuclear Family Emotional System

By forwarding this concept, Bowen focused on the effect of ‘undifferentiation’ on the emotional working of a particular generational family. He affirms that relationship fusion, which causes the formation of triangles, is the catalyst for symptom development which is demonstrated in one of these three categories: couple disputes, symptoms of a partner, and extension of a disagreement onto one or more children.

Bowen suggested that couple conflict can be beneficial for a strained relationship for the following reasons: it can provide a strong sense of emotional contact between the couple, it can explain the couple’s maintaining of a comfortable distance between them without feeling guilty, and it can allow persons to project tensions they have about themselves onto the other, thus protecting their positive view of self (Kerr and Bowen 1988, 192).

Bowen notes that a parent can pass on an emotional view of the world that can be passed onto subsequent generations, including, but not limited to behavior, substance abuse, emotional responses.

The Family Projection Process

This is an extension of the previous concept and points to the fact that the family member who has a ‘problem’ is triangulated and works to stabilize a dyad in the family unit. For instance, a son who rejects his mother’s advice may cause the parents to come closer as they seek to find a solution to their common problem.

However, under this concept, Bowen posits that children may develop certain indications when they are caught up in the earlier generation’s anxiety regarding relationships (Quadrio, 1986. pp. 184). He further says that the child who is least separated from the parents emotionally is at the highest risk of developing symptoms. This occurs when the child reacts to tensions between the parents. This results into the formation of a triangle with attention shifted to the child.

Emotional Cutoff

This concept is defined as a way by which family members cope with fusion between generations. A cutoff is realized through detachment or other ways of withdrawal. It is a severe reaction to the Family Projection Process, i.e. it involves a complete or near complete separation from the family.

Bowen differentiates between ‘breaking away’ from the family and ‘growing away’ from the family, stating that the former is seen as part of differentiation and mostly occurs at adulthood, while the latter, also known as a ‘cutoff’, is more of like an escape- people opting to completely turn away from their families. A person who has been cut off may will have very little or no contact with the family. However, persons who cut off their family have a higher probability of repeating the emotional and behavioral patterns they were taught.

Multi-generational Transmission Process

This concept explains the way emotional processes in a triangle are passed over and preserved over the generations from parent to child. The effect will be dissimilar for each child and will relate to the degree of triangulation between the children and their parents (James, 1989, pp. 179).

This shows how the entire family joins in the Family Projection Process, for instance, by strengthening the values of the family. As the family upholds and passes over this pattern over generations, they also refer back to earlier generations (“He is just like Aunt Betty- she was always irresponsible too”). McGoldrick (1982, pp. 47) writes,

By learning about your family and its history and getting to know what made family members tick, how they related, and where they got stuck, you can consider your own role, not simply as victim or reactor to your experiences but as an active player in interactions that repeat themselves.

Sibling Positions

In this concept, Bowen suggests that sibling position can facilitate a comprehension of the roles individuals tend to take in relationships. For instance, eldest children are more probable to take up on responsibility and leadership roles while younger siblings are more contented with being dependent and letting others make choices on their behalf while middle children are more flexible to shift between responsibility and dependence.

Bowen stressed that these generalized qualities are not universally valid and that it is possible for a younger sibling to become the most responsible and independent among all of his/her siblings. Bowen did extensive research on the sibling position that was more likely to create a triangle with the parents.

Societal Emotional Process

The concepts in Bowen’s theory can be applied to relations outside the family setup. This concept describes how emotion shapes behavior at the communal level and functions to encourage certain behaviors, both positive and negative. Cultural forces are critical to understanding how a society works but are deficient in clarifying the dynamics of how societies cope with their challenges.

Societal emotional processes are defined as social beliefs regarding racial and class groups, the behaviors for each gender, among other aspects, and their impact on the family. For instance, families that cope with discrimination or oppression will pass onto their offspring the ways they learned to survive these adversities. The survival tactics of the parents and other family members may lead to more or less adaptive emotional health in subsequent generations.

What Bowen is trying to achieve in therapy

Bowen viewed all families to exist along a continuum and while some texts may try to classify them into distinct categories, he maintained that there are really no ‘types’ of families, and any family of one type may change to another type if certain conditions changed. Bowen work was among the first to consider cultural differences in family therapy (McGoldrick et al, 1982, pp. 73).

Bowen’s work was aimed at assisting families towards to achieve a greater degree of differentiation characterized by less blaming, reduced reactivity, and improved responsibility among all members. Indeed, the most unique facets of Bowen’s therapy are his accent on the therapist’s background, the core role of the therapist in guiding conversation and his/her minimal emphasis on children. Bowen’s goal of family therapy can be deduced from his view of therapy, which he summarized in three broad steps:

• The first step aims at reducing the client’s anxiety by making them realize that their symptoms are part of their pattern of relating;
• The second step aims to increase the degree of differentiation among adult clients;
• In the final stages of therapy, adult clients are trained on how to differentiate themselves from their family of origin, the assumption being that an increase in the degree of differentiation will correspondingly cause a decrease in anxiety levels and enhance responsibility within the nuclear family unit (Goodnow and Lim, 1997, pp. 35).

How to use systemic theory in person-to-person therapy

The systemic theory can be used to undertake therapy in a number of situations. A family therapy involving one person generally focuses on differentiation of the individual from the family.

The therapist assists the person to stop seeing family members in terms of their positions or roles (brother, decision maker, caretaker, and so on) they played, rather, they should start seeing them as people who have their own weaknesses, strengths, faults, wants, and so on.

The individual learns to be aware of triangulation, and take some steps in either accepting or rejecting it whenever it occurs. The individual client should have good awareness into the family (this is where genograms become important), and be very much inspired to take drastic steps in altering his/her life, or in the family.

Bowen’s family system theory can be used to differentiate a person from his/her family such as the one I described in the Genogram Reflection paper. For example, once I have known the family that my subject came from, it becomes easier to identify why they bear certain emotions.

Supposing I had a client who had a background similar to the one described in the genogram reflection, it would be easier to establish the sources of his/her emotional responses. The fact that the subject’s father grew up in a family stricken with poverty can best explain his (the father) poor work ethic, a habit of saving money, and incessant disputes over money issues.

The father’s preoccupation with money issues mainly stems from his humble background as he did not want the same situation that afflicted them as children to repeat itself in his family.

Once the subject gets to know of this information after a therapy session, he/she will understand and indeed begin to appreciate the father’s efforts towards their well-being. In addition, this insight will enable the subject to differentiate himself/herself from the father’s background and this will correspondingly decrease anxiety levels and enhance responsibility within the family.

Use of a Genogram

A genogram can help the individual gain an insight into the various elements relating to the family such as the persons belonging to his/her family lineage, how these persons relate to each other emotionally, socially, and family relationships (McGoldrick and Gerson, 1985, pp. 21).

For instance, a genogram will not only tell you that your sister Helen and her husband Mark have four children, but that their eldest son dropped out of college, that their second eldest child refuses to listen to his parents’ advice, that the second last is schizophrenic, that the last one suffers from regular bouts of depression, that mark is an alcoholic and that Helen suffers from breast cancer and recently lost her job.

This information can be helpful in systemic counseling as it might help the client to find the reason for the nature of relationship he has with his sister and may help to differentiate himself from the sister’s family.

The nature of a client’s childhood may have a significant influence on their emotional functioning (McGoldrick and Gerson, 1985, pp. 6). Fortunately, a genogram can help unravel a client’s childhood and find solutions to their emotional problems.

For instance, a genogram could reveal that a client not only came from a large family, but the home was run in a military fashion, that the parents paid strong attention to education, that the father was abusive and that the large nature of the family affected family relations, hence the client was not very close to the parents. By asking questions that encourage differentiation, a therapist can help a client to overcome his/her childhood experiences and be more responsible for their own situation, rather than blame it on their upbringing.

In the genogram reflection, the nature of the client’s father and mother’s childhood is seen to have a significant effect on their lives. While the mother suffered from a severe alcohol problem that seem to have affected her all of her life, the father, coming from a background where poverty was common, is seen to be similarly affected by his childhood to an extent that he is constantly embroiled in disputes involving money.

He also rules his family with an iron fist, regularly beating his children and occasionally his wife. This information would be very critical in therapy of any member of a family.

Goodnow, K. K. and Lim, M. G., 1997. Bowenian Theory in Application: A Case Study. Journal of Family Psychotherapy , 8(1), 33-41.

Hare-Mustin, R., 1978. A Feminist Approach to Family Therapy. Family Process, 17(3), 181-194.

James, K., 1989. When Twos Are Really Threes: The Triangular Dance in Couple Conflict. ANZJFT , 10(3), 179-189.

Kerr, M., and Bowen, M., 1988. Family Evaluation: An Approach Based on Bowen Theory . NY: Norton.

McGoldrick, M. and Gerson, R., 1985. Genograms in Family Assessment . NY: Norton.

McGoldrick, M., Pearce, J. and Giordano, J., (Eds), 1982. Ethnicity and Family Therapy . NY: Guilford.

Quadrio, C., 1986. Analysis and System: A Marriage. Journal of Psychiatry , 18(22), 184-187.

Wylie, M. S., 1991. Family Therapy’s Neglected Prophet. The Family Therapy Networker , 43(17), 25-37.

• Maintaining Individuality in a Relationship
• The Merging of Family Life Education and Coaching Psychology
• "The Essentials of Family Therapy" by Nichols
• Family in "What's Eating Gilbert Grape?" by Hallstrom
• First-Person Narrative in Bowen's ”The Demon Lover,” Updike's ”A&P,” Fitzgerald's ”The Great Gatsby”
• Marriage and Family Counselling
• Dual Relationships and Boundaries
• Father as a Male Role Model
• Parental Differential Treatment and Favoritism
• Concept of Marital Conflict
• Chicago (A-D)
• Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2019, April 24). Bowen family system theory. https://ivypanda.com/essays/bowen-family-system-theory-essay/

"Bowen family system theory." IvyPanda , 24 Apr. 2019, ivypanda.com/essays/bowen-family-system-theory-essay/.

IvyPanda . (2019) 'Bowen family system theory'. 24 April.

IvyPanda . 2019. "Bowen family system theory." April 24, 2019. https://ivypanda.com/essays/bowen-family-system-theory-essay/.

1. IvyPanda . "Bowen family system theory." April 24, 2019. https://ivypanda.com/essays/bowen-family-system-theory-essay/.

Bibliography

IvyPanda . "Bowen family system theory." April 24, 2019. https://ivypanda.com/essays/bowen-family-system-theory-essay/.

• To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
• As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
• As a template for you assignment

IvyPanda uses cookies and similar technologies to enhance your experience, enabling functionalities such as:

• Basic site functions
• Ensuring secure, safe transactions
• Secure account login
• Remembering account, browser, and regional preferences
• Remembering privacy and security settings
• Analyzing site traffic and usage
• Personalized search, content, and recommendations
• Displaying relevant, targeted ads on and off IvyPanda

Please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy for detailed information.

Certain technologies we use are essential for critical functions such as security and site integrity, account authentication, security and privacy preferences, internal site usage and maintenance data, and ensuring the site operates correctly for browsing and transactions.

Cookies and similar technologies are used to enhance your experience by:

• Remembering general and regional preferences
• Personalizing content, search, recommendations, and offers

Some functions, such as personalized recommendations, account preferences, or localization, may not work correctly without these technologies. For more details, please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy .

To enable personalized advertising (such as interest-based ads), we may share your data with our marketing and advertising partners using cookies and other technologies. These partners may have their own information collected about you. Turning off the personalized advertising setting won't stop you from seeing IvyPanda ads, but it may make the ads you see less relevant or more repetitive.

Personalized advertising may be considered a "sale" or "sharing" of the information under California and other state privacy laws, and you may have the right to opt out. Turning off personalized advertising allows you to exercise your right to opt out. Learn more in IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy .

Virginia Satir’s Family Therapy Model

This essay about Virginia Satir’s theory explores her influential contributions to family therapy, particularly through her development of the Family Systems Theory. Satir believed that families function as interconnected systems, where individual behaviors impact the whole. She emphasized the role of communication styles in shaping family dynamics and individual self-esteem, identifying four dysfunctional communication stances—blaming, placating, being irrelevant, and being super-reasonable—and advocating for congruent communication as the path to healthy interactions. The essay also discusses Satir’s therapeutic methods, including family reconstruction and role-playing, which help individuals understand and improve their familial roles and interactions. Satir’s optimistic approach underlines the transformative potential of nurtured relationships within the family. Her work continues to influence therapeutic practices and offers valuable insights into fostering healthier family communications.

How it works

Virginia Satir, an avant-garde luminary in the realm of familial therapy, introduced theories and methodologies that reshaped our comprehension of familial interplay and discourse. Her contributions stand out for their accentuation of emotional transparency and fostering communication within the familial framework. Satir’s oeuvre not only expanded the horizons of therapeutic modalities but also provided profound insights into fostering healthier, more robust familial bonds.

Satir’s modus operandi in familial therapy was underpinned by the notion that the family constitutes a microcosm of society, wherein healing familial rifts could translate to individual healing.

Among her seminal contributions was the formulation of the “Family Systems Theory,” propounding that families function as systems rather than mere aggregates of individuals. According to this paradigm, alterations in one member’s conduct invariably trigger shifts in the behaviors of other members, with these interactions crystallizing into patterns that can either be salubrious or maladaptive.

At the crux of Satir’s doctrine lies the concept of self-regard. She contended that robust self-regard is indispensable for a gratifying existence and contended that familial communication modalities profoundly influence each member’s self-regard. Satir delineated four primary communication postures individuals adopt to navigate distressing circumstances: faultfinding, placation, incongruity, and hyper-rationality. Each stance epitomizes an endeavor to cope with stress but frequently engenders miscommunication and discord within the family fabric. She advocated that the fifth stance, congruous communication, wherein individuals articulate their genuine sentiments sans reproach or placation, is pivotal for fostering salubrious familial dynamics.

In her therapeutic praxis, Satir underscored the significance of “family reconstruction,” a process entailing the exploration of an individual’s past to fathom and reinterpret their encounters and perspectives within the familial milieu. This endeavor enables individuals to discern how their familial roles and anticipations have molded their conduct and to probe novel avenues of interaction conducive to healthier relationships. Her methodologies encompassed role-playing, familial sculpture, and an array of experiential drills that urge members to articulate their sentiments and explore novel modes of interaction.

Furthermore, Satir ardently championed the potential for evolution and metamorphosis within the familial framework. She espoused the belief that therapy ought to pivot on nurturing transformation rather than fixating on dysfunctionality. Her sanguine and humanistic approach to therapy impelled individuals to discern the best in themselves and their familial counterparts, fostering growth and recuperation through heightened self-awareness and communicative adeptness.

Virginia Satir’s impact transcends her clinical praxis and permeates her myriad publications, which persist in influencing therapists and families globally. Her capacity to articulate intricate emotional dynamics in accessible parlance has rendered her theories particularly invaluable to those endeavoring to comprehend and ameliorate their familial bonds. Through her endeavors, Satir has bequeathed an enduring legacy that persists in inspiring and steering both therapists and families in their quest for more concordant and fulfilling relationships. Her theories and methodologies endure as a lodestar for proponents of the transformative potential of nurtured and salubrious communication within the familial milieu.

Cite this page

Virginia Satir's Family Therapy Model. (2024, Apr 29). Retrieved from https://papersowl.com/examples/virginia-satirs-family-therapy-model/

"Virginia Satir's Family Therapy Model." PapersOwl.com , 29 Apr 2024, https://papersowl.com/examples/virginia-satirs-family-therapy-model/

PapersOwl.com. (2024). Virginia Satir's Family Therapy Model . [Online]. Available at: https://papersowl.com/examples/virginia-satirs-family-therapy-model/ [Accessed: 5 Nov. 2024]

"Virginia Satir's Family Therapy Model." PapersOwl.com, Apr 29, 2024. Accessed November 5, 2024. https://papersowl.com/examples/virginia-satirs-family-therapy-model/

"Virginia Satir's Family Therapy Model," PapersOwl.com , 29-Apr-2024. [Online]. Available: https://papersowl.com/examples/virginia-satirs-family-therapy-model/. [Accessed: 5-Nov-2024]

PapersOwl.com. (2024). Virginia Satir's Family Therapy Model . [Online]. Available at: https://papersowl.com/examples/virginia-satirs-family-therapy-model/ [Accessed: 5-Nov-2024]

Don't let plagiarism ruin your grade

Hire a writer to get a unique paper crafted to your needs.

Our writers will help you fix any mistakes and get an A+!

Please check your inbox.

You can order an original essay written according to your instructions.

Trusted by over 1 million students worldwide

1. Tell Us Your Requirements

2. Pick your perfect writer

3. Get Your Paper and Pay

Hi! I'm Amy, your personal assistant!

Don't know where to start? Give me your paper requirements and I connect you to an academic expert.

short deadlines

100% Plagiarism-Free

Certified writers